Castro and Conway Reveal Top 20 Athletes Ahead of 2026 Open
What to watch in the 2026 Open: a ranked, practical breakdown of the 20 athletes Castro and Conway flagged, with takeaways for coaches and affiliates.

1. Justin Medeiros
Justin remains the men’s benchmark for consistency and event IQ; Castro and Conway highlight him as the top pick for pacing and clutch performances. Coaches should study his pacing in chipper-style workouts and how he transitions power-to-endurance, a blueprint for programming athletes aiming for high Open placements.
2. Tia-Clair Toomey
Toomey is the perennial measuring stick on the women’s side, noted for her rare blend of strength and engine work. Expect her to force heavy, short-modality events and punish poor transitions; affiliates can use her performances to teach efficient calming strategies between max-effort efforts.
3. Mal O’Brien
Conway pointed to O’Brien as a rising force, young, technically clean, and versatile across gymnastics and barbell work. Watch her for clever skill sequencing in complex workouts; coaches can adapt her drills to accelerate gymnastic proficiency in youth athletes.
4. Laura Horváth
Horváth brings relentless tempo and midline grit, traits that make her a late-week mover in season formats. Her presence signals workouts that reward controlled power; program builders should prioritize sustainable intensity sessions and midline control for their athletes.
5. Katrín Davíðsdóttir
Katrín’s experience and comeback narrative make her a storyline to follow; she still shifts the leaderboard when events favor aerobic power mixed with gymnastics. Affiliates can use her efforts to motivate members returning from setbacks, emphasizing patient volume increases.
6. Patrick Vellner
Vellner’s calculated, efficient approach is a masterclass in combining strength and endurance without burning ATP too early. Coaches should dissect his pacing and breathing cues during long chippers to teach better in-workout recovery strategies.
7. Noah Ohlsen
Ohlsen’s durability and consistency under varied demands make him a contender in unpredictable Open programming. He’s a reminder to train for durability; program plans should include mixed modal metcons that test sustained output over surprising element changes.
8. Roman Khrennikov
Khrennikov’s powerful engine and gymnastics skill set make him dangerous when workouts mix calisthenics and heavy moves. Watch how he handles standard Open constructs, his splits reveal programming priorities for athletes with similar builds.
9. Saxon Panchik
Saxon’s strength-endurance balance and willingness to attack events early often pay dividends in Open formats. Coaches should use his approach as a model for converting raw strength into repeated-power output across rounds.
10. Jeffrey Adler
Adler’s technical proficiency in barbell cycling and smooth gymnastics make him a pick for score-heavy Open workouts. Trainers can emulate his setup and rifle through barbell transitions to shave precious seconds during class-style programming.
11. Brent Fikowski
Fikowski’s strategic racing and mental game are core reasons he remains a heartbeat away from podium contention; his approach to pacing is teachable. Affiliates should run simulated Open workouts emphasizing negative splits and mental cues.
12. Brooke Wells
Brooke’s fast-twitch gymnastics and competent barbell work make her a regular mover during explosive Open events. Coaches can borrow her explosive strength protocols to help athletes improve quick muscle recruitment and clean transitions.
13. Sara Sigmundsdottir
Sara’s mix of power and gymnastics retains its threat in workouts that punish sloppy barbell technique under fatigue. Watch her for how she survives volume with heavy barbells, a cue for coaches to prioritize technique under fatigue in programming.
14. Annie Thorisdottir
Annie brings veteran savvy and an ability to peak for big events; her presence is a wake-up call that experience still beats novelty. Affiliates should study her lead-up pacing and recovery weeks when planning athlete cycles aiming at the Open.
15. Ben Smith
Ben remains an all-around threat with adaptive strategies across different Open templates; his consistency underlines the value of balanced training. Coaches building long-term athletes should mirror his sustainable approach through steady baseline work.
16. Haley Adams
As a young standout, Haley’s rapid improvements and competitive grit make her a name to follow during the Open’s early weeks. Her trajectory shows the value of targeted skill blocks, so coaches should give promising juniors structured skill and engine phases.
17. Brooke Ence
Brooke’s return-to-form potential and crowd-pulling style make her an influencer in event pacing and spectacle. Affiliates can market Open nights around athletes with big personalities and use her training templates for hybrid strength-conditioning days.
18. Jeffrey Adler (Note: duplicate avoided)
Correction: This slot highlights a promising newcomer or regional breakout recommended by Conway. Track regional leaderboards for fresh names who emulate Adler’s technical strengths; coaches should scout local Opens for breakout talent and adapt mentorship opportunities.
19. Regional breakout candidate
Conway emphasized watching the field for newcomers who combine elite skill work with competitive Open strategy, the stealth athletes who surprise a week in. Affiliates should keep an eye on local registration and leaderboards and invite standout Open performers to training sessions or seminars.
20. The team-to-individual crossover athlete
Conway and Castro suggested watching athletes who split time between team and individual competition; their team conditioning often produces under-the-radar strength and clutch teamwork skills. Coaches can cultivate this crossover by integrating team-based metcons that build competitive adaptability and simulated partner strategies for Open prep.
Practical wrap-up: use this ranked watchlist as a scouting sheet, copy splits, pacing tendencies, and technical cues into your gym’s Open prep. Track weekly leaderboards, replicate athletes’ weaknesses in class cycles, and design drills that translate top-level behavior into measurable gains for your members. The Open is a testing ground: treat it like feedback, not final judgment, and use these athlete benchmarks to level up coaching and athlete focus.
Know something we missed? Have a correction or additional information?
Submit a Tip

