Two arrested for murder after Amazon warehouse parking lot shooting kills employee

Two men were taken into custody on murder charges following a fatal shooting in a parking lot outside an Amazon warehouse on the far west side of Bexar County. Deputies say 26-year-old Katrael Delosier was killed and another person was wounded after the Jan. 11 incident; authorities detained 20-year-old David Perez Morales Jr. and 21-year-old Jamari McKillion on Jan. 13 and held them on $300,000 bonds as the probe continued.

Investigators relied on a mix of evidence to connect the suspects to the scene. The arrest affidavit cited surveillance footage that captured movements in the parking lot, interviews with witnesses on site, and mobile-location data that placed the accused in the area at the time of the shooting. Deputies told investigators the confrontation followed earlier verbal altercations between employees, suggesting the encounter escalated from on-premises conflict to deadly violence.

For workers and residents near large distribution centers, the case highlights the importance of situational awareness and preserving potential evidence. Security camera footage, phone video, and eyewitness contact information can be decisive in building a timeline and establishing probable cause. Investigators in this case used those usual building blocks of modern police work, CCTV review, witness statements, and cell-location data, to move from initial scene response to arrest.

The shooting has immediate consequences for the Amazon workforce at that facility and for the broader community that relies on shift work and late-night parking. Employers and property managers may face renewed pressure to review parking lot lighting, patrol presence, and conflict de-escalation training for staff. For employees, practical steps include reporting threats or repeated confrontations to supervisors and preserving any recordings that could be relevant to an investigation.

Legally, murder charges and $300,000 bonds signal prosecutors consider the case serious and the suspects potentially dangerous or flight risks. The arrests do not determine guilt; court proceedings and any additional forensic results, such as ballistic analysis, will shape the prosecution. The investigation remains active, and deputies are continuing to sift through digital and physical evidence.

This episode underscores how workplace disputes can spill into public spaces with tragic results and how traditional investigative techniques and digital forensics converge to hold suspects accountable. For readers, the next developments to watch will be formal charges filed in court, any forensic findings that emerge, and whether the employer or local officials announce changes to safety measures around the facility.