Baker City Fire Chief Urges Residents to Get Burn Permits During Warm Spell
Baker City saw a surge in burn calls last week, yet 90–95% of residents lighting yard debris already had the required $5 permit.

Record-breaking warmth hit Baker City earlier than usual this spring, and residents wasted no time torching piles of yard debris and lighting barrels of material before the season's typical burn-ban window arrives. That rush to the backyard prompted Fire Chief Michael Carlson to remind anyone striking a match inside city limits: a current municipal burn permit is required first.
According to the Baker County Dispatch Center, the fire department fielded calls about several reported fires over roughly the past week. Carlson said the calls were largely a product of unfamiliar neighbors, not reckless burning. In most cases, the person who called in a fire simply did not know the neighbor had a city burning permit.
"Typical springtime events, but earlier than usual," Carlson said on Monday, March 23. "I would do the same thing."
The compliance numbers backed him up. Carlson said 90% to 95% of the residents firefighters spoke with during those calls had the required permit already in hand. Still, the reminder carries practical weight: the permit costs only $5 per year and is valid solely within Baker City limits, meaning county residents burning outside the city boundary fall under different rules entirely.
Permit information is available at bakercity.com/2327/Burn-Permits.
The urgency behind Carlson's message has a seasonal dimension that Baker City residents know well. In most summers over the past decade or so, the fire department has banned outdoor burning entirely due to high fire danger. The window for legal open burning in the city tends to be short, and this year's early warm spell compressed it further.
Know something we missed? Have a correction or additional information?
Submit a Tip

