Baker City Man Arrested Twice in Two Days on Sex Offender Warrant
A Baker City man was arrested twice in two days after sheriff's deputies served a circuit court warrant charging failure to report as a sex offender and other offenses, raising local safety concerns.

A Baker City man was taken into custody twice over a two-day span after local law-enforcement officers served a Baker County Circuit Court warrant charging him with two counts of Failure to Report as a Sex Offender and multiple additional offenses. The sequence of arrests highlights enforcement of registration requirements and the coordination between city and county policing functions.
On Jan. 13 at approximately 6:08 p.m., a Baker City police officer responded to a Midway Drive address and arrested James Scott Keister, 53, on a harassment charge. The following day, on Jan. 14 at approximately 5:24 p.m., a Baker County Sheriff's deputy served an arrest warrant at a K Street address. Keister was arrested on a Baker County Circuit Court warrant that listed two counts of Failure to Report as a Sex Offender and additional warrants for Unlawful Use of a Weapon, Criminal Mischief I, menacing domestic violence and Assault IV. Keister was lodged in the Baker County Jail following the arrests.
The charges stem from obligations tied to sex-offender registration and reporting. Failure to Report allegations typically relate to alleged noncompliance with statutory duties to notify authorities about residence or status changes; when paired with the other warrants listed, the case will proceed through the Baker County Circuit Court system. The involvement of both Baker City Police and the Baker County Sheriff's Office reflects normal interagency procedures when circuit court warrants are served and multiple jurisdictions have related concerns.

For Baker County residents, the case underscores ongoing questions about public safety and enforcement of reporting laws. Registered sex-offender oversight is intended to protect neighborhoods and inform community risk assessments. The presence of additional allegations including unlawful use of a weapon and assault charges may increase local attention to how cases are investigated and prosecuted at the county level.
The arrests also illustrate how law-enforcement agencies in Baker County coordinate to execute warrants and manage custody through the Baker County Jail. Those procedural actions affect how quickly alleged offenders are remanded, how information is shared with the public, and how victims and neighbors receive updates.
As the case moves through the Circuit Court, residents can expect court filings and hearings to clarify the evidence and potential penalties. Community members with concerns about registration compliance or public safety are encouraged to contact Baker County law enforcement for guidance. The outcome of this case will have implications for enforcement practices and community trust in local public-safety institutions.
Sources:
Know something we missed? Have a correction or additional information?
Submit a Tip

