Douglas County Canine Rescue Faces Nine PACFA Charges, Hearing Scheduled
The Colorado Department of Agriculture filed nine administrative charges on December 21, 2025 against Douglas County Canine Rescue, a Castle Rock registered nonprofit, alleging multiple violations of the Pet Animal Care and Facilities Act. The action could bring fines and licensing consequences, and it raises questions about oversight of foster networks and animal welfare in the county.

The Colorado Department of Agriculture Pet Animal Care and Facilities Act program filed nine administrative charges against Douglas County Canine Rescue on December 21, 2025, alleging a pattern of regulatory violations that state inspectors say endangered animals and misrepresented operations. The complaint centers on claims that the rescue operated without a valid shelter license, falsified records, failed to provide timely veterinary care for injured animals, and unlawfully housed large numbers of dogs in private residences.
According to the administrative filing, a foster home inspection record dated March 6 was created but never completed, a practice PACFA describes as falsification of records. The filing also cites a case in which a 10 week old puppy reportedly broke a leg on August 6, 2023 but did not receive veterinary treatment until August 16. Inspectors say that a foster volunteer complaint prompted further scrutiny, including attempts to inspect foster homes and a search warrant executed at the operator's residence that reportedly uncovered 23 dogs at that location.
PACFA has scheduled a notice to appear in the Office of Administrative Courts for February 13, 2026. The agency is seeking penalties reported as $1,000 per violation and may pursue licensing sanctions depending on the administrative outcome. The timeline places a contested hearing in front of the administrative court early next year, where evidence and testimony will determine possible fines and conditions for continued operation.

For Douglas County residents who adopt, foster, or rely on local rescue groups, the allegations underscore gaps in oversight within informal foster networks and the regulatory mechanisms meant to protect animal welfare. If the rescue is fined or loses its license, animals currently in foster care could face disruption while placements are reviewed, and prospective adopters may experience delays. The case also highlights the role of foster volunteers in reporting concerns and the importance of transparent record keeping for nonprofits that handle large numbers of animals.
The rescue's attorney did not respond to requests for comment. The administrative hearing in February will offer a formal setting for adjudication of the nine charges and for PACFA to present its evidence.
Sources:
Know something we missed? Have a correction or additional information?
Submit a Tip

