Forsyth County Schools Propose Significant Revisions to Employee Harassment Policy
Forsyth County school officials propose removing an existing sexual harassment definition from employee policy, replacing it with updated legal language.

Forsyth County school officials are proposing significant revisions to the district's employee harassment policy, including the removal of an existing definition for sexual harassment and the introduction of updated legal language, changes that would alter guidelines that have been in place for years.
The proposed revisions surfaced during a Forsyth County school board work session, where board members reviewed the scope of changes to a policy governing how harassment of employees is defined and addressed. The session marked the first public disclosure of the proposal, which district officials describe as an effort to update long-standing harassment guidelines.
Central to the proposal is the removal of language that currently defines sexual harassment within the employee policy. While the district has not publicly released the full text of the proposed changes or the exact wording of the definition slated for removal, the revisions are characterized as altering how harassment is defined at the district level. New legal language would be inserted in place of or alongside the removed definition, though the specific framing of that replacement has not been made public.
The changes raise substantive questions about what protections will remain for district employees once the existing definition is stripped from the policy. Anti-harassment policy experts generally recommend that written district policies identify specific types of prohibited harassment with examples, require staff to report incidents, establish clear complaint procedures, and include explicit anti-retaliation protections. Whether the Forsyth County proposal preserves or strengthens each of those elements remains unclear until the full draft is released.

Key details the board has yet to disclose publicly include the rationale behind removing the sexual harassment definition, whether district legal counsel reviewed the proposed language for Title IX compliance, and any timeline for a formal vote or public comment period. No board members have been quoted on record explaining the reasoning for the change.
The district's HR department, employee groups, and the Title IX coordinator have not publicly weighed in on the proposal. A full redlined draft of the revised policy, along with the work session minutes, would provide the clearest picture of what Forsyth County employees stand to gain or lose under the new language.
Know something we missed? Have a correction or additional information?
Submit a Tip

