State Trooper Arraigned on Felony Perjury and Obstruction Charges
A Michigan State Police trooper, Charles Sierzputowski, was arraigned January 2 on two felony counts alleging he lied under oath during his wife’s drunken-driving crash trial. The trooper, suspended without pay from the MSP Cadillac Post, pleaded not guilty and was released on a $10,000 personal recognizance bond.

A Michigan State Police trooper assigned to the Cadillac Post was arraigned January 2 on felony charges alleging he gave false testimony during his wife’s drunken-driving crash trial. Trooper Charles Sierzputowski, 44, pleaded not guilty and was released on a $10,000 personal recognizance bond. Court filings indicate prosecutors have charged him with perjury and obstructing justice.
Prosecutors allege Sierzputowski made false statements while testifying in his wife’s criminal proceeding. The perjury charge carries a potential sentence of up to 15 years if convicted; the obstructing justice count carries a maximum penalty of five years in prison and fines of up to $10,000. A probable cause conference was scheduled as the next step in the court process.
Following the arraignment, Sierzputowski was suspended without pay from the Cadillac Post pending the outcome of the investigation and legal proceedings. The suspension removes an active-duty trooper from local patrol and investigatory duties at a time when many law enforcement agencies are managing tight staffing levels, administrative demands, and increased public scrutiny.
For Grand Traverse County residents, the case raises questions about courtroom integrity and trust in law enforcement testimony. When a sworn officer faces allegations of false testimony, prosecutors and defense attorneys alike point to the importance of a transparent legal process. The scheduled probable cause conference will determine whether the case proceeds to trial, and any conviction would carry significant criminal penalties and professional consequences for the trooper.

The legal timetable and possible administrative actions will unfold in county courts and within the state police internal review process. Until those proceedings are completed, the charges remain allegations and Sierzputowski retains the right to a defense and to due process. Local officials have emphasized adherence to legal norms in high-profile cases involving public servants, balancing accountability with the presumption of innocence.
Residents seeking information about court dates or official statements may monitor Grand Traverse County court schedules and announcements from the Michigan State Police. The outcome of the probable cause conference and any subsequent hearings will determine the next phase of this matter and its impact on both the local law enforcement community and public confidence in the justice system.
Sources:
Know something we missed? Have a correction or additional information?
Submit a Tip

