Residents Call For Pause on Brunswick Landing Construction Over PFAS
An opinion column posted December 15 argued that oversight failures by the Midcoast Regional Redevelopment Authority allowed PFAS contamination to spread after a 2024 release of firefighting foam at Brunswick Landing. The writer urged a construction pause until up to date hydrogeological mapping and full environmental remediation planning are completed, a call that matters to residents concerned about water safety and future development.
A Brunswick area community advocate has called for a halt to construction at Brunswick Landing, saying oversight failures have allowed PFAS contamination to spread since a 2024 release of firefighting foam. The opinion piece, posted December 15, laid out a demand that the Midcoast Regional Redevelopment Authority pause redevelopment until hydrogeological mapping is brought up to date and the full legal cleanup process is followed.
The column named specific actors to act, urging the redevelopment authority, the Navy, state regulators and local planners to adopt recommendations from Brunswick Area Citizens for a Safe Environment and to move through the full Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act permitting and remediation process before further work proceeds. The writer framed the pause as necessary to determine the extent of PFAS and other contaminants in groundwater and soils beneath the former naval air station.
PFAS are persistent man made chemicals widely used in firefighting foam and linked to long term environmental persistence and public health concerns. For residents of Sagadahoc County, the issue raises questions about drinking water safety, the future of property development at Brunswick Landing, and the oversight practices of agencies charged with managing contaminated sites. Calls for additional mapping aim to clarify how contaminants move through local aquifers and to inform decisions about land use and remediation.
Local leaders and planners now face a trade off between advancing redevelopment that brings jobs and new uses to the former base and addressing community demands for thorough environmental review. The advocate argued that proceeding without comprehensive hydrogeological data and completion of the CERCLA process risks compounding contamination and undermining public trust.
The situation remains dynamic. Community groups are pressing for formal responses from the redevelopment authority, the Navy and state regulators, and residents will be watching for new testing results, regulatory steps and any official decisions about pausing construction or initiating expanded cleanup measures.
Sources:
Know something we missed? Have a correction or additional information?
Submit a Tip
