33 Years Later, Sharon Stafford's 1993 Duluth Murder Remains Unsolved
A Clay County jury acquitted the only suspect in Sharon Stafford's 1993 death after jurors questioned whether his alleged confession was coerced.

Sharon Stafford was 26 years old when her body was found in a Moorhead, Minnesota mobile home park in November 1993. More than three decades later, no one has been convicted of killing her, and the case remains as cold as it was the morning Clarence Burcham called 911 to report her death on Nov. 2, 1993.
Burcham, a Center, North Dakota man, was not charged in Stafford's death until the summer of 2009, when a cold case detective interviewed him and police alleged he admitted to strangling Stafford with an electrical cord after she called him "retarded." That alleged confession became the centerpiece of a murder trial that ended in acquittal, leaving prosecutors with no conviction and the investigation without a resolution.
Clay County prosecutor Heidi Davies was unambiguous about where she stood. "That's it. He confessed. He was the one who has been a suspect all along. That's the verdict," she said after the jury returned its not-guilty verdict. Davies also said she had not a doubt in her mind that Burcham strangled and raped Stafford. But she acknowledged the case's limitations, noting the jury might have been applying "2011 expectations to a 1993 case," a reference to the absence of DNA or forensic evidence tying Burcham to the crime.
The defense told a different story. Twin Cities-based attorney Eichhorn-Hicks said he had asked Burcham, whom he described as "more of a friend at this point than a client," to tell him the complete truth, and that Burcham's denials never wavered. "I believe him. I honestly believe him. I don't think he could tell me that and look me in the eyes as good of friends as we've become and I wouldn't know it," Eichhorn-Hicks said. The defense also planned to call an expert on false confessions to challenge the reliability of the alleged admission, a strategy that appeared to resonate with at least one juror, who said the detective seemed to be leading Burcham during the interrogation.
Over seven days of trial testimony, police witnesses argued that Burcham's accounts of the night Stafford died had been continuously inconsistent, dating back to the very first call he made to 911. The jury was unconvinced. Burcham walked out of the Clay County Jail a free man, greeted by his oldest sister. "Didn't we say keep your head up?" she said as she embraced him. She told reporters her heart had been pounding when the jury summons came, and that she felt certain an innocent man had nearly been imprisoned. She also said she felt sorry for Stafford's family and hoped police would find who killed her.
That has not happened. The killing, now 33 years removed from the night Burcham dialed 911, remains unsolved. No additional suspects have been publicly named, and the acquittal under double jeopardy protections means Burcham cannot be retried. The note in the research flagging the title's reference to "Duluth" as the location conflicts with court and news records placing the death in Moorhead, a city in Clay County near the North Dakota border, roughly 240 miles northwest of Duluth. That geographic discrepancy has not been publicly resolved, and the official record from the Clay County trial identifies Moorhead as the jurisdiction.
For Stafford's case, the gap between what prosecutors believed happened and what a jury was willing to conclude without physical evidence captures a recurring problem in cold case prosecutions: the passage of time erodes both forensic opportunity and the legal standards juries apply when someone's freedom is at stake.
Know something we missed? Have a correction or additional information?
Submit a Tip

