Gibbs-White hat-trick stings Tottenham after failed summer pursuit
Gibbs-White’s hat-trick again exposed Tottenham’s failed pursuit, while Forest locked him to a club-record deal through 2028.

Morgan Gibbs-White’s hat-trick turned into a fresh indictment of Tottenham Hotspur’s summer chase, because the player Spurs tried to prise away from Nottingham Forest is still driving Forest’s rise while Tottenham are left to measure what they missed.
Forest made that point emphatically on July 26, 2025, when Gibbs-White signed a new three-year contract that runs until the summer of 2028. The club described it as a club-record deal and as a “statement of intent” from owner Evangelos Marinakis, a signal that Forest intended to build around one of the central figures in their Premier League resurgence rather than cash in on him.
Tottenham’s attempt to land Gibbs-White in July 2025 had already sparked a bitter dispute. Forest accused Spurs of making an “illegal approach”, threatened legal action and wrote to Tottenham and Gibbs-White’s agent, alleging a breach of confidentiality over his release clause. Reports at the time said Tottenham had moved with a £60 million offer or release-clause trigger, but the deal stalled as the row escalated.

The size of the stand-off matters because Gibbs-White did not fade after the noise around his future. On March 15, 2025, he delivered a superb display in Forest’s 4-2 win at Ipswich Town, a result that pushed Forest one point behind second-placed Arsenal and underlined how decisive he had become at the sharp end of the Premier League race. That performance also came after his omission from Thomas Tuchel’s first England squad, a reminder that his club form was already forcing wider debate about his standing.
Forest’s decision to shut the door on Tottenham now looks increasingly astute. Gibbs-White was not a peripheral target, but a player they viewed as central to their momentum at the City Ground and one whose value rose with every influential performance. His hat-trick reinforced that point with force. It also sharpened the question for Tottenham: whether their talent identification had failed at the exact moment they needed authority, creativity and end product most, and whether any renewed summer move would now meet a price they can no longer reach.
Know something we missed? Have a correction or additional information?
Submit a Tip

