Goldman Sachs Publishes Guidance Detailing Employee Integrity Reporting Channels, Protections
Goldman Sachs published a guidance called "Raising Integrity Concerns" outlining 24/7 hotlines and a web form for employees and the public to report integrity issues, with promised confidentiality and anti-retaliation protections.

Goldman Sachs has issued public guidance called "Raising Integrity Concerns" that lays out how employees, vendors and members of the public can report compliance, accounting or other integrity issues to the firm. The guidance positions these channels inside the firm’s Business Integrity Program and emphasizes confidentiality and a strict prohibition on retaliation.
The guidance states, "As part of Goldman Sachs’ Business Integrity Program, the firm provides its people and the public with various channels through which integrity concerns can be raised without reprisal." It explains that "These matters may be communicated on an anonymous or disclosed basis via toll free hotlines or a web form through an independent third party that specializes in the discreet reporting of integrity concerns" and that "Both means of escalation are available 24 hours a day, seven days a week globally." The document adds, "All reports are handled in accordance with the firm’s confidentiality protocols. The firm strictly prohibits any retaliation for reporting a possible violation of law, ethics or firm policy, no matter whom the report concerns."
Details in the excerpts include a country-specific list of toll-free numbers that the guidance reproduces verbatim, with entries such as "United States +855 316 2433" alongside many other international numbers. Another corporate excerpt directed at vendors cites alternate hotline contacts: "U.S.: 1 (866) 520-4056 • Global: 1 (917) 343-8026." The materials supplied to reporters do not reconcile those differing numbers.
The guidance arrives amid a documented evolution of the company’s external escalation program. Regulatory materials say, "In 2015, GS Group revamped its external escalation program, which provides employees and the public with various channels through which integrity concerns can be raised without reprisal, and renamed it the 'Business Integrity Program.'" The same filings note that "Since 2015, the number of escalations to the Business Integrity Program has more than doubled" and that communications were refreshed in 2017 with posters in lobby and pantry areas and ongoing educational campaigns.
Historical episodes and regulatory enforcement underscore the practical stakes for whistleblowers. A senior partner, James C. Katzman, dialed the firm's whistle-blower hotline in 2014 to raise ethics concerns and expected outside counsel monitoring the hotline to investigate; instead, the inquiry was taken over internally and his complaints were urged to be set aside. Regulatory excerpts also tie past failures to escalate allegations to a Federal Reserve Board action that "requires the Company to cease and desist, assesses a civil money penalty of $154 million, and requires the Company to agree to take certain affirmative actions" including written remediation plans for oversight of significant and complex transactions and enhanced anti-bribery controls.
Workers and vendors should note that a recorded hotline message reproduced in the materials says, "There are no restrictions on the types of incidents that can be reported," and "You don't have to give your name, but they'd prefer it if you did." Other reporting in the record reflects whistleblower fear: "Banks will always punish you and you will never be able to get a job again," and "Literally everyone I know is frustrated at their inability to escalate issues without risking their jobs."
For employees, the guidance codifies multiple reporting routes and formal anti-retaliation language, but past disputes over how complaints were handled and the apparent discrepancy in public contact numbers mean workers should confirm the active hotline or web form before filing and document their reports. The program’s expansion and the regulator-mandated remediation plans suggest the firm remains under scrutiny and that escalation channels will continue to be a focus for employees, vendors and supervisors alike.
Know something we missed? Have a correction or additional information?
Submit a Tip

