Homan defends masked ICE raids as safety amid reform fight
Homan says he dislikes ICE officers wearing masks but calls them necessary for safety; Democrats demand reforms as public opposition grows.

White House border czar Tom Homan acknowledged that he "doesn't like the masks either" but said "These men and women have to protect themselves," defending the use of face coverings by Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers during enforcement actions.
Homan made the comments in an interview on Face the Nation, where he framed mask use as a safety measure amid what he described as rising threats to ICE personnel. He told interviewer Ed O'Keefe that assaults against Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers have increased by 1,500% and that threats have risen by 8,000%. The Department of Homeland Security, in a Jan. 26 news release cited by CBS, said assaults against ICE officers had increased by more than 1,300%; "Neither Homan nor the release gave a timeframe for that surge, nor did they give a source for the assault and threat claims," according to the same report.
The exchange comes as Democratic leaders press for sweeping changes to immigration enforcement and have conditioned support for new Department of Homeland Security funding on reforms. Measures under consideration include requiring judicial warrants for actions on private property, banning officers from wearing face masks while mandating identification, and stronger protections for people in custody. An AOL national survey reported that 63% of adults disapprove of federal officers wearing masks during recent enforcement activities, with notable partisan splits: more than 90% of Democrats and 75% of independents disapprove, compared with 18% of Republicans.
The White House has pushed back vigorously. A fact presentation circulated by the administration stated in part, "FACT: 70% of ICE arrests have involved illegal aliens convicted of, or charged with, crimes." It cited Center for Immigration Studies figures listing 35.7% of people in ICE detention as having criminal convictions, 30.5% with pending criminal charges, and 33.8% labeled "other immigration violators." The document also defended the legal basis for brief questioning of suspected noncitizens, quoting the Immigration and Nationality Act language to assert the practice is not racial profiling.

Homan rejected accusations that ICE operations amount to racial profiling. "There is no racial profiling," he said, adding that requirements for judicial warrants are "not what the federal law requires" and "If Congress wants that change, then Congress can legislate." The White House document also cited anecdotal incidents in defending ICE, including a characterization of a case referenced on Morning Joe and an unnamed individual who allegedly assaulted agents with a weed whacker while fleeing, language that was presented as part of the administration rebuttal to critics.
Public health and community trust hang in the balance as lawmakers weigh policy changes. Masked enforcement can heighten fear among immigrant communities and chill contact with public institutions, including health care providers and local law enforcement, according to advocates who argue that visibility and accountability during raids are central to protecting civil rights and ensuring safe access to services. Polling that finds broad disapproval of masked agents underscores political pressure on legislators deciding DHS funding and oversight terms.
The competing claims about assault trends and the White House statistical assertions illustrate a larger transparency gap. As negotiations over funding and policy continue, public health officials, civil rights advocates and lawmakers say clear data on incidents, timelines and agency practices will be essential to evaluate safety claims, protect communities, and craft reforms that address both officer safety and the civil liberties of the people ICE encounters.
Know something we missed? Have a correction or additional information?
Submit a Tip

