IndyCar pulls shirt after fans spot racist double meaning in slogan
A $50 IndyCar shirt pairing Lincoln with One Nation. One Race vanished the same day it went live after fans said it carried a racist double meaning.
IndyCar pulled a Freedom 250 T-shirt from its online store after fans said the slogan could be read as a white-supremacist message, turning a patriotic race promotion into a branding failure. The shirt featured Abraham Lincoln in a racing helmet, with ONE NATION above ONE RACE, a design that was meant to evoke American unity but quickly drew accusations that it echoed exclusionary language.
The shirt went on sale on May 6 and was withdrawn that same day after the backlash spread across social media. One report said it was priced at $50 before it was removed. IndyCar said it had heard customer feedback and took down the item, but the speed of the reversal underscored how little room sports brands now have for ambiguity when symbolism is involved.
The controversy landed at a sensitive moment for the series. The Freedom 250 Grand Prix is scheduled for Aug. 21-23, 2026, as part of the America 250 celebration marking the 250th anniversary of U.S. independence. President Donald Trump announced the Washington, D.C. IndyCar street race as part of that push, and the event has been described as the first IndyCar race on or near the National Mall, close to landmarks including the Lincoln Memorial. In that setting, the Lincoln imagery was likely intended to reinforce national identity and historical continuity, but the slogan’s wording shifted the focus from motorsport and commemoration to race, language and political symbolism.
The episode also showed how quickly merchandising can become a test of brand governance. Other Freedom 250 items remained on sale after the shirt came down, including shirts, mini helmets, hats and magnets, suggesting the problem was not the event itself but the specific combination of image and wording. For IndyCar, the lesson was stark: a patriotic concept can become a reputational liability if the approval process does not anticipate how fans, and the broader public, will read the message once it is online.
Know something we missed? Have a correction or additional information?
Submit a Tip
