U.S.

Trump announces two-year shutdown of Kennedy Center for rebuilding

President Trump says the Kennedy Center will close July 4 for roughly two years for "complete rebuilding," a move that deepens legal, cultural and local economic uncertainty.

Lisa Park4 min read
Published
Listen to this article0:00 min
Share this article:
Trump announces two-year shutdown of Kennedy Center for rebuilding
Source: people.com

President Donald Trump announced on his social platform that the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts will suspend performing operations beginning July 4 for what he described as "construction, revitalization, and complete rebuilding," a shutdown he said would last about two years. Mr. Trump framed the plan as necessary to address long-standing problems at the complex and said the move is subject to approval by the Kennedy Center board, which he now chairs after a period of board turnover.

Mr. Trump said financing for the project was "fully in place" and asserted he had worked with Congress to secure funds to support the work. "I have determined that The Trump Kennedy Center, if temporarily closed for construction, revitalization, and complete rebuilding, can be, without question, the finest performing arts facility of its kind, anywhere in the world," he wrote. He added that the decision followed advice from "Highly Respected Experts" and would transform "a tired, broken, and dilapidated Center" into a "World Class Bastion of Arts, Music, and Entertainment."

The announcement follows a contentious six months for the institution. The board voted in December to rebrand the center to include Mr. Trump's name and installed new members who then elected him chair. New signage appeared on the exterior soon after the vote, and a string of artists and institutions responded by withdrawing participation or leadership roles. Named performers and producers who have canceled work or stepped back include Issa Rae, Renée Fleming, Shonda Rhimes, Ben Folds and Jeffrey Seller, the producer who withdrew a planned run of Hamilton. The Washington National Opera said it will move performances away from the center, and the head of artistic programming departed abruptly less than two weeks after being appointed.

The president defended a full temporary closure as the fastest way to complete high quality construction. "In other words, if we don't close, the quality of construction will not be nearly as good, and the time to completion, because of interruptions with Audiences from the many events using the facility, will be much longer," he said. He also described the complex as being in "tremendous disrepair" and said it was "not going to be woke."

Kennedy Center leadership allied with the president framed the plan as preservation. Ric Grenell, president of the center, said, "Our goal has always been to not only save and permanently preserve the Center, but to make it the finest Arts Institution in the world," and cited funds Congress approved for repairs.

AI-generated illustration
AI-generated illustration

Opponents have questioned the legality and motive of the renaming and the closure. Democratic lawmakers argue a name change requires legislation because the center was established by Congress, and a joint statement by two groups called the renaming "illegal," warned that artists and patrons had left in protest, and said Mr. Trump's closure announcement "raises serious questions about whether his purpose isn't to renovate but to shut the Center down to avoid further embarrassment. We already have court proceedings pending and we will be considering all legal remedies to address this new and concerning development."

Staff and community stakeholders say the abruptness of the move deepens uncertainty about jobs, programming and local economic effects. An anonymous senior staffer said, "I don't know what any of it means." Beyond immediate disputes over governance and naming, the plan raises broader questions about access to cultural institutions, the livelihoods of performers and stage crews, and how public funds are prioritized for national cultural assets.

Key elements remain unresolved: whether the board will formally approve the closure, the precise timetable and budget for a two-year overhaul, and the legal outcomes of challenges to the renaming. For now, the announcement has intensified a confrontation over stewardship of a major national cultural institution and the role of federal oversight, community access and artistic autonomy.

Know something we missed? Have a correction or additional information?

Submit a Tip

Never miss a story.
Get Prism News updates weekly.

The top stories delivered to your inbox.

Free forever · Unsubscribe anytime

Discussion

More in U.S.