West Baltimore Tenants Win $1.4 Million After Juries Find Illegal Rent Charges
Two Baltimore juries ordered owners of Reginald and Marguerite Daniels Housing and Bellevieu-Manchester to pay $1,434,981 to five West Baltimore tenants for collecting rent without consistent rental licenses.

Two Baltimore juries awarded a combined $1,434,981 to five tenants of West Baltimore apartment buildings after finding landlords liable for fraud and related claims tied to charging rent without consistent rental licenses. The judgments, entered in Baltimore City Circuit Court before Judge Paul Cucuzzella, reimburse unlawfully collected rent and include damages for emotional distress and punitive awards.
The plaintiffs named in the litigation are Margaret Little, Vivian Hires, Johnetta Johnson, Elwood Dorsey and Cora Williams; the group includes seniors and tenants with disabilities, and several live in federally subsidized units. Margaret Little, the lead plaintiff and tenant organizer, was awarded $281,513 and said, "We just wanted a place to live decently." Little added, "I'm not a young girl. I'm in my seventies and I just wanted quality of life."
The lawsuits, filed in 2023, focused on two neighboring properties: Reginald and Marguerite Daniels Housing for the Elderly and the Bellevieu-Manchester apartments. The litigation was tried in separate jury trials for each building, with juries delivering verdicts on Jan. 28, 2026 and Feb. 2, 2026. Maryland Legal Aid represented the tenants and reported that Towner Management Co. Inc., the properties' manager, reached an "amicable settlement" and was removed from the case in late January 2026.
Trial evidence as summarized by reporting alleged persistent, unlivable conditions at the properties, including chronic mold, mice and cockroach infestations, unsecured doors and apartments that went without heat. Plaintiffs sought refunds of rent they said was unlawfully collected in addition to punitive and emotional distress damages; juries awarded sums that sources report average roughly $280,000 to $290,000 per plaintiff.
The tenants pressed an uncommon legal theory: fraud and deceit for charging rent while lacking consistent rental licenses. The complaints also referenced statutory claims under the Maryland Consumer Protection Act and the Maryland Consumer Debt Collection Act. Attorneys described the fraud claim as a high-risk, high-reward strategy; one Maryland Legal Aid attorney, identified as Saffo in a news release, said, "This case is about accountability, but it is also about human dignity."

Public records show the landlords were not listed with defense counsel as of August 2024, and Gina Sammons is listed as the resident agent for both properties; requests for comment to the listed agent did not receive an immediate response. The verdicts leave open practical questions reported but not yet resolved: which legal entities hold the judgments, whether owners will appeal, and how the awarded amounts will be collected.
Plaintiffs and their attorneys framed the outcome as both restitution and a message to landlords that noncompliance with Baltimore's rental licensing rules and substandard conditions can carry significant financial consequences.
Know something we missed? Have a correction or additional information?
Submit a Tip

