JOOLA settles patent dispute with Paddletek and ProXR over paddle sales
JOOLA’s deal with Paddletek and ProXR keeps the paddles on shelves for now, but the real impact is stricter inventory, royalties and a tighter grip on future designs.

JOOLA’s first settlement in its paddle patent fight does not wipe the models off the market overnight. It keeps Paddletek Reserve, HoneyFoam and ProXR Signature Jolt paddles in play for a designated inventory allotment, then starts the wind-down through the fall of 2026.
That is the part amateurs and retailers will feel first. The agreement means those paddles can keep selling for now, but not indefinitely, and not without a new cost structure. Paddletek Group and ProXR also agreed to add JOOLA’s propulsion core patent number to the relevant paddles and pay royalties, turning what started as an infringement dispute into a licensing-style arrangement that recognizes JOOLA’s claim.

For players, the practical consequence is simple: availability should not vanish immediately, but the product mix is likely to tighten. Once that allotted inventory is gone, those specific models are headed toward the exit, which could push buyers toward remaining stock, alternative paddle lines, or newer releases built to fit around JOOLA’s protected core technology. Any time royalties enter the picture, pricing pressure usually follows.
The deal matters beyond three paddle names because it only closes one front in a much larger battle. JOOLA said the settlement does not affect the other nine respondents named in its April 7 filing with the International Trade Commission, a case that originally targeted 11 paddle brands. So while Paddletek Group and ProXR chose to settle, the broader fight over propulsion-core designs is still alive.
That is why this looks less like a cleanup move and more like a market signal. Paddle technology is no longer just marketing language about pop, spin and feel. It is now a legal boundary line, and brands that cross it may have to pay to stay on shelves. JOOLA has said its propulsion core technology sits at the center of the modern performance era in pickleball, and industry coverage has noted that the two patents tied to the dispute are expected to run until 2043.
JOOLA chief executive Richard Lee framed the outcome as a principled resolution reached in mutual respect, while Paddletek Group chief executive Ron Saslow said his company takes intellectual property protection seriously and relies on its own patents and trademarks. However the companies dress it up, the lesson for the equipment market is hard to miss: the next big battleground in amateur pickleball is not just who plays the cleanest third shot drop, but who gets to sell the paddle that makes it possible.
This article was produced by Prism’s automated news system from verified source data, official records, and press releases, then run through automated quality and moderation checks before publishing. The system is built and supervised by the people who set the standards it runs under. Read our full AI policy.
Did this article answer your question?


