Jeremy Parker tops Auden Larratt 3-1 in East vs West 24 prelim

Jeremy Parker did more than survive a prelim at East vs West 24. His 3-1 win over Auden Larratt landed as one of the card’s most visible undercard results, because the name on the other side, the 115 kg right-arm best-of-5 format and the way East vs West amplified the bout all pushed it well beyond a routine opener.

East vs West posted the match as a full video, and a separate results clip also put Parker-Larratt front and center in the event recap cycle. That kind of post-event treatment matters. Prelims usually disappear under the weight of title talk, but this one got replay value, which tells you the result carried more pull than a normal early-card win.

Part of that attention comes from Auden Larratt’s profile. Gold’s Arm lists him at 21 years old, 221 pounds and 6-6 in tracked matches, a record that makes him a live developmental name rather than just another bracket entry. When a young, visible puller with that kind of public match log steps into a 115 kg spot, the result becomes a checkpoint: not just who won, but what the winner was able to expose.

Parker’s 3-1 margin suggests he handled the technical phases well enough to keep Larratt from turning the bout into a momentum swing. In arm wrestling terms, that usually means winning key setup battles, staying organized through the hand fight and making the better adjustments when the match reset between rounds. Larratt’s side had room to build pressure, but Parker prevented the match from settling into a rhythm that favored the younger puller.

The broader context makes the win even sharper. Gold’s Arm shows Larratt coming into East vs West 24 off a 95 kg middleweight right-arm match at LPAL 3 against The Specialist Kevin Wolf on 2026-01-31 and an Arm Havoc 13 meeting with Kevin Wolf on 2026-04-25. That is an active run of appearances, not a one-off cameo, which means Parker’s win arrived against a puller already building a public resume.

For Parker, that is the cleanest kind of headline. He beat a high-visibility opponent on a major stage and did it 3-1, enough separation to make the result legible and meaningful. In a card built around bigger names, this was the undercard win that refused to stay in the background.