Top FCS stars spurn transfer portal, stay at their FCS programs

“Those two words indicate that some of the top FCS stars staved off the transfer portal, choosing to remain at the schools that built them into the playmakers we see on Saturday afternoons.” That choice has real teeth behind it: high-profile players repeatedly declined outside offers, preferring loyalty to teammates, coaches and the communities that shaped them.

We start where the last season ended: Montana State. The Bobcats won the FCS national championship and were on top of the world. Rather than cashing in on post-title attention, players such as Brungard used leadership to keep the nucleus intact. “I wanted to get my teammates in the city excited for what's to come. I have a ton of amazing players around me on both sides of the ball, and they're getting offered to go leave and go other places,” Brungard said. “I guess they followed my lead and they felt the same way I did. They wanted to stay loyal, and so we were able to keep a lot of great players on our team.”

Montana State’s ability to retain contributors after a championship is a counterweight to the pull of FBS programs searching for ready-made impact talent. The transfers and recruiting blitz that follow a title run often reshuffle rosters; Montana State’s choice to keep core pieces preserves continuity on both offense and defense and gives coaches continuity in scheme and culture entering spring drills.

Community ties are at the heart of several return decisions. “Taco Dowler knows the Montana State community well as a Montana native. He’s hosted youth camps and more. Dowler knows his decision to remain a Bobcat can be an example for the kids whose shoes he was in just a few years ago.” That kind of local investment does double duty: it reinforces recruiting pipelines inside the state and fuels game-day atmospheres that matter for home-field advantage in FCS playoff settings.

Across the state line, Montana’s offense also had headline returns. “Montana quarterback Keali’i Ah Yat was one of three notable Grlizzy offensive stars to announce their returns, joining Gilman and wide receiver Brooks Davis.” It “wasn’t a group decision for Montana’s Big Three, but there was some communication amongst the trio,” a dynamic that suggests informal leadership and mutual encouragement influenced separate choices to stay.

This pattern highlights a broader tension in modern college football: the transfer portal and NIL-era inducements create lucrative alternatives, yet the intangible value of program fit, peer relationships and fan loyalty can outweigh financial or exposure incentives for some players. “Overall, the decision to remain at the FCS level is one that demonstrates an intense loyalty between player and fanbase. The sense of community established at an FCS program is impactful.”

For fans and follow-the-football bettors, the immediate consequence is clearer roster forecasting and higher expectations for repeat contention at programs that retain stars. For FCS athletic directors and coaches, the wins are strategic and cultural: keeping award-caliber talent in-house strengthens playoff odds and preserves the local narrative that fuels recruiting. The broader season ahead will test whether loyalty translates into sustained on-field success and whether other FCS standouts follow the same path in an increasingly fluid transfer era.

FCS AWARDS: Walter Payton Award history | Buck Buchanan Award history | Jerry Rice Award history