Hanover Central beats Lowell 18-13, 31-Point Final Rekindles Shot-Clock Debate
Langdon Oldenburg cut a piece of the net after Hanover Central survived a 18-13 win over Lowell in Cedar Lake, a 31-point game that ranks as the second-lowest combined total in the class era and reignited the shot-clock debate.

Langdon Oldenburg clipped a piece of the net as Hanover Central advanced to regionals with an 18-13 victory over Lowell in the Class 3A sectional final in Cedar Lake on Saturday night, a combined 31 points that ranks as the second-lowest total in the class era for a sectional game.
The scoring unfolded like a series of defensive stands. Hanover led 6-4 after the first quarter, a span Mason Williams described on X as “Both teams have been ... patient in their offensive approach. Wildcats and Red Devils each content to pass around a zone defense and play their offense close to the chest thus far.” Halftime arrived at 10-9 for Hanover, and Williams added, “Almost a carbon copy of the first eight minutes a slow pace, not many shot attempts for either team. HC's six turnovers haven't helped either, but the Red Devils have missed more looks from the field.”
Play grew even more compressed in the third quarter, when the two teams combined for a single bucket that sent Lowell into the fourth up 11-10. Hanover broke the logjam late, outscoring Lowell 8-2 in the fourth quarter to reach the final 18-13. The arithmetic from the 10-9 halftime score and the 18-13 final shows 12 combined second-half points; one report that suggested 17 second-half points is inconsistent with the halftime and final lines.
Local photos underlined the finish: Langdon Oldenburg cutting a piece of the net in celebration, Chris Maranowicz chasing down a rebound ahead of Lowell’s Cass Hejnowski, and Ezra Rumisek driving for a layup in one of the few bright offensive flashes captured by the NWI Times gallery.
The result moved Hanover to 12-14 for the season, and left Lowell at 7-18, reconciling pregame records published earlier that listed Hanover 11-14 and Lowell 7-17. Preseason and preseason-adjacent coverage noted stakes: Hanover was defending last season’s sectional title and Lowell was chasing its first sectional crown in 33 years, with the winner advancing to regionals.

The finished score also re-energized a long-running debate about a high-school shot clock in Indiana. “Indiana high school basketball doesn't have a shot clock,” wrote Billy Heyen, summing up the argument driving national attention to the game. He added, “Implementing shot clocks across a state obviously isn't easy. There's a lot of initial cost involved. But an 18-13 basketball game certainly will have people thinking about the possibility of that change.” Other outlets and social posts framed the finish as proof that statewide shot clocks deserve renewed consideration, noting the low total occurred even as both teams played active defense rather than merely stalling.
Historically, the 31 combined points slots the game behind a 30-point Norwell-Fort Wayne matchup from 2007 on a list compiled on social media of lowest combined sectional scores. That list also includes Valparaiso 22, Portage 17 in 2002 and Eastern (Greentown) 26, Madison-Grant 17 in 2016, cementing how rare a 31-point final is in Indiana postseason play.
Lowell’s path to the final was anchored by a 45-32 semifinal win over River Forest in which coach Joe Delgado praised his team’s defense: “I thought our defensive pressure was really good, and our rotation the entire night was also effective,” Delgado said, adding that rebounding and limiting extra possessions were keys. That defensive identity carried into the championship but could not overcome Hanover’s fourth-quarter push.
On3 summed up the sectional result: “FINAL: Hanover Central 18, Lowell 13. The Wildcats are back-to-back Class 3A Sectional 18 champions. #nwipreps” Hanover now moves to regionals, while the unusual final will likely be cited in coming conversations about whether Indiana high school basketball should adopt a shot clock.
Know something we missed? Have a correction or additional information?
Submit a Tip

