Debbie O’Connell, 2025 Adaptive CrossFit Champion, Faces Potential Contempt Proceedings
High Court found Debbie O’Connell’s evidence “must be dishonest,” and the MoD has applied for contempt proceedings that could carry up to two years in prison, O’Connell is the 2025 Adaptive CrossFit Games Upper - 1 Point champion.

A High Court judge in 2025 concluded that Debbie O’Connell’s evidence about ongoing pain “must be dishonest,” throwing out her scaled £1.74 million damages claim against the Ministry of Defence and ordering a “£200,000-plus costs bill.” Judge Christopher Kennedy KC found the case had been lost on grounds of “fundamental dishonesty” after reviewing evidence that included surveillance footage shot in 2022.
O’Connell launched the original claim in September 2018 for £2.4 million, later reduced to £1.74 million. The claim arose from a 2015 incident when she was serving in the Royal Horse Artillery’s ceremonial King’s Troop and fell off a horse, breaking her collarbone; she had said the fall left her left arm “almost useless.” By 2022 she was reporting she “needed assistance with cutting food and preparing hot drinks along with aspects of bathing and dressing/undressing,” and that pain “remained the same as before and it restricted her daily activities,” a factual account the judge cited when weighing the surveillance footage.
The surveillance footage showed O’Connell performing tasks the judge considered inconsistent with her evidence, including leading a horse and chopping vegetables, a discrepancy that formed part of the court’s finding that parts of her case “must be dishonest.” Despite the judge acknowledging she had been injured, the claim was dismissed on the dishonest findings and the costs order followed.
Following that judgment, the Ministry of Defence has applied to bring contempt of court proceedings seeking committal. MoD barrister Niazi Fetto argued there was “public interest” in pursuing the contempt application, and legal filings made as part of that step put the possibility of a custodial sentence on the table; if convicted of contempt, O’Connell could face up to two years in prison. O’Connell’s barrister, Ian Denham, countered in the recent court material that she had “already suffered enough” after losing the claim and being ordered to pay the MoD’s legal costs. The judge in the contempt application ruled against O’Connell at that stage and a further hearing to decide committal will be scheduled for a later date.

Parallel to the litigation, O’Connell has been an active para-athlete. After leaving the army she won cycling gold at the 2018 Invictus Games and claimed sprinting golds at world-level competitions; she also entered Adaptive CrossFit competition. WheelWOD podium listings show O’Connell finished second in the Women - 1 Point Upper Impairment division in 2024 and won that same division at the 2025 Adaptive CrossFit Games in Las Vegas, where the September 2025 ruling was handed down shortly before the event began.
What happens next is procedural but consequential for an athlete with a public title: a contempt hearing must be scheduled, the written High Court judgment will likely be scrutinized for the judge’s full findings, and the possibility of a two-year sentence looms while O’Connell retains her 2025 Adaptive CrossFit Games title on the WheelWOD podium lists. Her past explanation that as a soldier she had been taught to “push through pain” and that she is “simply doing her best to make the most of her life, despite her injury” remains on the record, but the court’s finding of “fundamental dishonesty” now sits at the center of both the legal and reputational questions surrounding her athletic achievements.
Know something we missed? Have a correction or additional information?
Submit a Tip

