Investment

Chennai Bank Employee Arrested for Stealing Gold Jewelry Worth 1.34 Crore

Bank staff found 1,156.50 grams of gold under a chair. The woman guarding Chennai's private lockers had put it there.

Rachel Levy2 min read
Published
Listen to this article0:00 min
Share this article:
Chennai Bank Employee Arrested for Stealing Gold Jewelry Worth 1.34 Crore
AI-generated illustration
This article contains affiliate links, marked with a blue dot. We may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you.

The gold was supposed to be safe. Bank lockers, sealed with dual keys and governed by access protocols, represent the closest thing most Indian families have to a private vault. Padmapriya, 38, worked as a locker custodian at a private bank in Chennai and understood that trust intimately. She also exploited it.

Chennai police's Central Crime Branch arrested Padmapriya on April 4, 2026, on suspicion of stealing gold jewellery worth approximately ₹1.34 crore, but the case began unraveling months earlier. In December 2025, bank staff discovered a small purse containing 1,156.50 grams of gold tucked beneath a chair on the premises. No customer came forward to claim it. The branch manager filed a complaint, and a multi-month investigation followed.

What detectives uncovered went beyond a misplaced purse. Evidence showed that Padmapriya had accessed customer lockers using bank keys under the pretext of conducting routine audits, exploiting the very oversight mechanism designed to protect depositors. In one confirmed instance, she removed 246.49 grams of gold from a customer's locker. That theft had already produced a prior criminal case, and she was out on bail for it at the time of her latest arrest. The investigation into the recovered 1,156.50 grams suggested she had quietly returned that quantity to the bank at some point before the purse was found. She has since been arrested and remanded.

The mechanics of the breach are what should concern every locker holder. The audit pretext is a documented vulnerability: access that should require the customer's own key alongside the bank's can be circumvented when staff have unsupervised time with master or duplicate keys. Internal audits, designed to protect depositors, can instead provide cover for unauthorized entry when access logs are not cross-referenced against customer-confirmed visits.

Independent verification is no longer a precaution reserved for the deeply suspicious. Photograph locker contents at every visit and timestamp the images. Keep a sealed written inventory with a trusted family member or attorney, noting each piece by weight, description, and approximate value. Request a locker-visit log from your branch periodically and confirm that every entry corresponds to an access you authorized. If the jewelry stored amounts to anything near ₹1 crore in value, ask your insurer about a scheduled personal property rider covering theft from third-party storage; standard home policies rarely extend that protection. Ask the branch manager directly who holds access to locker-area keys, how staff audits are logged, and whether those logs are reviewed by anyone outside the branch.

The Central Crime Branch is pursuing further action. For the customer whose 246.49 grams disappeared before December's discovery ever came to light, the damage had already been done quietly, under the cover of an audit, by the person holding the keys.

Know something we missed? Have a correction or additional information?

Submit a Tip

Discussion

More Gold Jewelry News