Investment

Ohio AG Seeks Removal of Township Official Over $9.7 Million Gold Coin Purchase

Ohio AG asked a judge to remove Miami Township fiscal officer Robert Matthews after he allegedly directed a $9.7M public funds purchase of gold coins.

Priya Sharma1 min read
Published
Listen to this article0:00 min
Share this article:
Ohio AG Seeks Removal of Township Official Over $9.7 Million Gold Coin Purchase
Source: www.daytondailynews.com
This article contains affiliate links — marked with a blue dot. We may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you.

The Ohio Attorney General's Office went to court on March 9 seeking the removal of Miami Township fiscal officer Robert Matthews, alleging he steered $9.7 million in public funds toward the purchase of gold coins in what the state describes as an improper use of township money.

The civil action places Matthews at the center of a case that raises pointed questions about how public officials handle community finances, and what authority a fiscal officer actually holds when it comes to directing large-scale asset purchases. Gold coins, whatever their intrinsic or numismatic value, are not a recognized instrument of municipal treasury management under Ohio law.

The Attorney General's office alleged that Matthews withdrew funds and instructed the purchase, though the full scope of those instructions had not been made public as of the March 9 hearing. The state's decision to pursue removal rather than simply a financial penalty signals the seriousness with which prosecutors view the alleged breach of fiduciary duty.

AI-generated illustration
AI-generated illustration

Miami Township, located in Ohio, is a local government entity whose fiscal officer is entrusted with managing public accounts according to state statute. That role carries strict obligations around how and where funds may be invested or disbursed. A $9.7 million gold coin acquisition would represent an extraordinary deviation from standard municipal investment practices, which typically require government approval, competitive bidding, and adherence to state-approved investment vehicles.

The case is now before a judge, and Matthews's future in the role depends on the court's findings. If removed, it would mark one of the more unusual public finance controversies in recent Ohio municipal history, not for the dollar figure alone, but for the asset at its center.

Know something we missed? Have a correction or additional information?

Submit a Tip
Your Topic
Today's stories
Updated daily by AI

Name any topic. Get daily articles.

You pick the subject, AI does the rest.

Start Now - Free

Ready in 2 minutes

Discussion

More Gold Jewelry News