Government

Maryland Lawmakers Race Toward Crossover Day Deadline on Key Baltimore Bills

Gov. Wes Moore promised 7,000 new Baltimore-area homes by converting idle transit parking lots, as Maryland lawmakers raced a mid-March crossover deadline.

Marcus Williams2 min read
Published
Listen to this article0:00 min
Share this article:
Maryland Lawmakers Race Toward Crossover Day Deadline on Key Baltimore Bills
Source: governor.maryland.gov
This article contains affiliate links — marked with a blue dot. We may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you.

Empty parking lots beside Metro stations and MARC stops became the unlikely centerpiece of Maryland's legislative sprint toward crossover day, as Gov. Wes Moore pushed a bill that he said would generate 7,000 new homes by converting underused transit land into housing, with Baltimore City and Baltimore County among the primary beneficiaries alongside Prince George's and Montgomery counties.

Moore made the case for the legislation during its committee hearing. "We know that we now have empty parking lots that frequently sit next to our Metro stations and our MARC stops, which is, frankly, just wasted opportunities to be able to address a fundamental issue," he said. "This [bill] will be responsible for adding an additional 7,000 new homes by being able to leverage that land." Both the House and Senate were anticipated to give final approval to the measure before or on crossover day.

Crossover day marked the last opportunity for bills to pass their final vote, known as third reading, in the chamber where they originated before being sent to the other chamber for consideration. Any bill missing that threshold faced what observers described as political limbo, with little realistic path to passage before sine die on April 13.

The transit housing push was not the only high-profile measure under pressure. Moore, House Speaker Joseline Peña-Melnyk and Senate President Bill Ferguson had opened the 2025 session with a unified call to ban dynamic pricing at grocery stores. The Protection From Predatory Pricing Act would prohibit retailers from using either peak-demand pricing or consumer surveillance data to set food prices. The two practices, while often conflated, differ in a key way: dynamic pricing raises costs for all customers during high-demand periods, while surveillance pricing tailors prices to individual shoppers based on their personal data.

AI-generated illustration
AI-generated illustration

Towering over every negotiation was a $3.3 billion budget deficit that dominated the session's final weeks. Moore and legislative leaders reached a framework pairing roughly $1 billion in tax increases with an estimated $2.5 billion in spending cuts. Lawmakers described the agreement as one designed to preserve essential services while avoiding significant new tax burdens on most Marylanders, though the specific programs facing cuts and the taxes slated for increases were not detailed publicly.

Beyond the budget, the General Assembly also advanced bills touching energy and utility regulation, tenant protections, and measures aimed at shielding undocumented residents from federal immigration enforcement. Several unnamed high-profile measures failed to clear crossover day entirely, ending their viable path to the governor's desk before the April 13 close of session.

Know something we missed? Have a correction or additional information?

Submit a Tip
Your Topic
Today's stories
Updated daily by AI

Name any topic. Get daily articles.

You pick the subject, AI does the rest.

Start Now - Free

Ready in 2 minutes

Discussion

More in Government