Bamberg County Coroner Begins Charging Fees for Reports and Permits
Bamberg County posted a notice that, effective January 1, 2026, the Coroner’s Office will begin charging fees for certain reports and services, including autopsy and toxicology reports and cremation permits. The change affects families, funeral providers, and others who request coroner documents, and raises questions about access, cost recovery, and public accountability at the local level.

Bamberg County’s official website carried an alert announcing that, as of January 1, 2026, the Coroner’s Office will impose fees for a range of documents and services. The notice, displayed in the county alerts and news modules and visible on public-facing pages, lists the new schedule: Autopsy Report, $125; Toxicology Report, $100; Consults, $50; Cremation Permits, $35; Coroner’s Report, $35. The announcement was signed by Shawn B. Hanks, Coroner, and asked the public for understanding regarding the change.
The fees apply to records and services that are routinely sought by families, funeral directors, attorneys, and law enforcement. An autopsy report and toxicology report often form part of death investigations and of documentation families use for insurance, legal, or administrative purposes. Cremation permits are required for disposition of remains when cremation is chosen. The newly instituted charges mean those who previously received these documents at no charge will now face out-of-pocket costs.
For many residents the amounts are modest in isolation, but they can add to funeral and post-mortem expenses at a sensitive time. The change has immediate practical effects: families assembling paperwork for burial or cremation, legal representatives requesting records, and funeral homes processing permits must now account for these fees. In a county where household budgets are constrained, even small fees can influence decisions and access to documents.
The coroner’s move also raises policy and institutional questions about transparency and fiscal responsibility. Charging for records can be framed as cost recovery for laboratory testing and administrative work; at the same time, such changes are decisions by local government that merit public explanation and oversight. Residents seeking detail on the rationale, expected revenue, or impact on vulnerable households will look to county leaders and the Coroner’s Office for answers.
Because the notice appears on the county’s public pages, residents can confirm the fee schedule there. Local elected officials and civic groups may consider this a point for public discussion at county meetings, where decisions affecting fees, budgets, and access to government records are appropriate subjects for scrutiny. As the change takes effect, the community will be watching for follow-up information from the Coroner’s Office and county administration about implementation, exemptions, and any measures to mitigate hardship for low-income families.
Sources:
Know something we missed? Have a correction or additional information?
Submit a Tip

