Buena Vista County leaders question state public health restructuring plan
County health leaders warned supervisors the state’s restructuring could leave Buena Vista families waiting longer for immunizations, disease follow-up and emergency help.

Buena Vista County’s public health system could be pulled into another major state reorganization before local leaders have a clear map of how it would work, and administrators warned supervisors that the biggest risk is uncertainty itself. Public Health Administrator Tracy Gotto and Assistant Administrator Lacey Anderson briefed the Buena Vista County Board of Supervisors Tuesday morning, laying out what Iowa officials have said so far and the many details that still have not been answered.
Gotto told supervisors the state has sent mixed signals for months. After last year’s overhaul of mental-health and substance-use services, county leaders had been told another large restructuring was not likely. Now public health realignment is back on the table, and the model appears to be moving toward a district-style setup similar to the mental-health changes. Gotto also noted that counties previously rejected a similar lead-entity approach during mental-health regionalization. Under current law, each county still must maintain a public health presence, but that leaves open major questions about staffing, liability and which agency would serve as the administrative lead.
Those questions matter in Buena Vista County because the work is not abstract. Local public health is what keeps emergency preparedness and response coordinated, helps track disease outbreaks, and supports immunization and tuberculosis services for schools, nursing facilities and employers. Iowa HHS reported that as of May 2025, every county provided emergency preparedness and response, 99% provided disease follow-up, surveillance and control, and 97% provided immunization and tuberculosis services.
Funding is part of the concern. Gotto said the state eliminated tuberculosis funding this year, shifting those costs to counties. Iowa HHS says its TB Control Program still works with local public health agencies and offers incentive funding for directly observed therapy, but local public health agencies are responsible for infectious TB investigations. Supervisors questioned whether the state was pushing more obligations downward without adding support.
The pressure is sharper in rural counties, where local departments often run lean. Iowa HHS says local boards of health statewide invested about $40 million in public health work in state fiscal year 2024, and 1,306 people worked on behalf of local boards of health. More than half of local public health agencies employed fewer than 10 people, and nearly two-thirds had an administrator turnover in the prior six years. In Buena Vista County, that turnover is already familiar: Julie Sather left the county public health post in 2025 to become chief clinical officer at Buena Vista Regional Medical Center.
State officials will try to answer more of those questions at a regional town hall April 23, with Iowa HHS Director Kelly Garcia and her deputy expected to explain the proposal further. For Buena Vista County, the next few weeks could determine whether public health stays close to home or gets folded into a structure that is still undefined.
Know something we missed? Have a correction or additional information?
Submit a Tip

