HarperCollins UK Drops David Walliams, Cites Employee Wellbeing Concerns
HarperCollins UK has announced it will not publish any new books by bestselling author David Walliams following an investigation that surfaced allegations of inappropriate conduct toward junior staff, a decision that underscores shifting publisher priorities and reputational risk in children’s publishing. Walliams denies being informed of any allegations and says he was not involved in any investigation while he takes legal advice, leaving readers, retailers and the wider industry to weigh commercial success against workplace accountability.

HarperCollins UK has told stakeholders it will not publish any further books by David Walliams after an investigation brought claims of harassment and inappropriate behaviour toward junior female employees to light. The publisher released a brief statement saying, “After careful consideration, and under the leadership of its new CEO, HarperCollins UK has decided not to publish any new titles by David Walliams. The author is aware of this decision.”
The move ends a prominent commercial relationship between one of Britain’s most successful children’s authors and a major publishing house. Walliams, 54, has sold more than 60 million copies worldwide and published over 40 books since his first children’s novel in 2008. Several of his titles have been adapted for television and he remains a high profile cultural figure because of his previous role as a judge on Britain’s Got Talent.
HarperCollins framed its decision within a corporate duty of care. The company said it “takes employee wellbeing extremely seriously and has processes in place for reporting and investigating concerns,” and added that “to respect the privacy of individuals we do not comment on internal matters.” The publisher also noted the decision was taken under new leadership amid recent executive turnover, a change that the company said informed its evaluation of the situation.
The allegations emerged from a newspaper investigation that identified claims that Walliams had harassed or behaved inappropriately toward junior female staff. Public reporting to date has not disclosed specific incidents, dates, or the identities of complainants, and the publisher has not confirmed whether an internal inquiry reached findings beyond the course of the statement announcing the publishing decision.
Walliams has strongly denied the allegations through a spokesperson who said he “has never been informed of any allegations raised against him by HarperCollins.” The spokesperson added that he “was not party to any investigation or given any opportunity to answer questions,” that “David strongly denies that he has behaved inappropriately,” and that he is “taking legal advice.” It remains unclear whether Walliams will pursue legal action or seek to negotiate with the publisher over future print rights and royalties.
The commercial implications are immediate and complex. HarperCollins must weigh potential cancellations and returns of existing stock, the future of ongoing licensing and television adaptations, and the reaction of booksellers and consumers who have long embraced Walliams as a household author for children. For authors, agents and publishers, the case crystallises a broader industry reckoning over workplace conduct and the reputational calculus of continuing to do business with high selling names amid contested allegations.
Culturally, the decision highlights a tension in family publishing between beloved content and the behaviour of creators off the page. Parents, educators and broadcasters now face questions about what to do with existing material that remains commercially successful while reputational concerns persist. The episode also reinforces how modern publishers must navigate staff wellbeing, public trust and commercial imperatives simultaneously. As both legal and internal processes move forward, the industry will watch closely for how facts are established, how institutions respond, and how audiences decide to separate art from the actions of its creators.
Know something we missed? Have a correction or additional information?
Submit a Tip

