Hearth Brewing in Harrison, Ohio Tops USA TODAY 10Best 2026 New Breweries

1. Hearth Brewing (Harrison, Ohio) — No. 1 on USA TODAY 10Best

Hearth Brewing in Harrison, Ohio is listed as No. 1 on USA TODAY 10Best’s 2026 Readers’ Choice list of the 10 Best New Breweries in the United States. The 10Best list covers breweries that opened since 2023 and was produced using nominations from a panel of beer experts and online voting by readers, with the 10Best editors publishing the final results. The supplied snippets give Hearth Brewing only its top placement and location; the taproom’s opening date, flagship beers, founders and vote totals were not included and require follow-up reporting.

2. No. 2: name not supplied in the provided 10Best snippets

The research excerpts do not include the brewery listed at No. 2, so the name and location are absent from the material available. What is explicit is the selection process: “nominations from a panel of beer experts and online voting by readers; the 10Best editors publish the final results,” which applies to every ranked spot, including No. 2. Reporters should retrieve the full USA TODAY 10Best page to capture No. 2’s name, hometown, tasting-room details and any descriptive copy that accompanied its nomination.

3. No. 3: name not supplied in the provided 10Best snippets

No. 3 is similarly missing from the supplied excerpts; the database only identifies Hearth Brewing as No. 1. Because the list is a Readers’ Choice produced from expert nominations, No. 3’s presence on the list implies it opened since 2023 and earned both expert nomination and reader votes—facts worth confirming when the full list is accessed. Follow-up should request vote counts, whether the panel provided shortnotes on style or standout beers, and any photos or brewer quotes for No. 3.

4. No. 4: name not supplied in the provided 10Best snippets

The research material lacks the identity of No. 4, but the editorial framework is clear: the 10Best program is run under the editorial umbrella that “provides users with original, unbiased and experiential travel coverage of top attractions, things to see and do, and restaurants for top destinations in the U.S. and around the world.” Use that mission to contextualize why a brewery might rank highly—taproom experience and travel appeal often matter as much as beer—but confirm specifics for No. 4 through the full article and brewery outreach.

5. No. 5: name not supplied in the provided 10Best snippets

No. 5’s name and hometown are not present in the excerpts. The supplied research flags a number of follow-up priorities that apply directly: obtain the full winners list (Nos. 1–10) and the publication date and byline for the 2026 list, plus any editorial notes about eligibility beyond “opened since 2023.” For No. 5, those details will determine regional representation and whether the ranking favored brewpubs, production breweries, or destination taprooms.

6. No. 6: name not supplied in the provided 10Best snippets

The snippet set does not list No. 6; the only guaranteed facts for every spot remain the eligibility window (openings since 2023) and the nomination/vote methodology. Journalists should request the names and credentials of the “panel of beer experts” who nominated breweries—this helps readers evaluate why a specific brewery occupied No. 6 and clarifies whether style, innovation, or destination appeal drove nominations.

7. No. 7: name not supplied in the provided 10Best snippets

No. 7 is absent from the supplied excerpt. The research notes include a recommended contact list—among them, asking USA TODAY 10Best or Catherine Smith for panel information and vote totals—actions that would unlock the narrative for No. 7 (and nos. 2–10): who nominated it, how many reader votes it received, and whether any tie-break rules were applied.

8. No. 8: name not supplied in the provided 10Best snippets

No. 8’s entry was not captured in the supplied material. The research explicitly preserves a number of related editorial touches and placeholders—“Previous Winners” with “2025” under it and “Related Awards” such as “Best New Museum (2026)” and “Best New Hotel (2026)”—which demonstrate how USA TODAY frames year-to-year winners as part of a larger travel-and-restaurant awards program. When you publish the full roster for No. 8, include whether that brewery is part of a multi-award hospitality cluster or a lone craft-beer jewel in its town.

9. No. 9: name not supplied in the provided 10Best snippets

No. 9 is also missing from the supplied snippets. The research package contains adjacent USA TODAY content (unrelated to breweries) including baby-name coverage and TODAY show notes—items that illustrate the publisher’s editorial reach but are separate from the brewery list. For No. 9, prioritize gathering the specific brewery write-up and any accompanying quotes; the research explicitly warns that no quotes from Hearth Brewing staff or other winners were included in the snippets, so fresh interviews will be necessary.

10. No. 10: name not supplied in the provided 10Best snippets (context and related 10Best examples)

The supplied material does not identify the brewery at No. 10, but it does include an example of 10Best’s coverage format from a restaurant list—No. 10: 855-ALOHA—which “captures the spirit of Waikiki during its golden age of the 1960s” and is described as “Located inside Romer House Waikiki.” That restaurant entry names Chef Bradley Dodson and menu items such as Chinatown Chili Crisp Chicken and the Kalbi Ribs, and it explains the name’s origin: “The restaurant's name is a callback to the phone booths that once populated the island, where anyone could dial 855-ALOHA and reach a global operator.” Use this restaurant example as a stylistic guide when assembling No. 10’s brewery entry: readers expect location, atmosphere and at least one standout product or dish (or beer). Also note the presence of names in the snippets with unclear roles—Wendy O'Dea appears with no context and should be vetted before attribution.