Business

Jury Finds Live Nation and Ticketmaster Violated Antitrust Laws

A jury said Live Nation-Ticketmaster overcharged fans on tickets sold from May 2020 through 2024, reviving breakup pressure on the live music giant.

Sarah Chen2 min read
Published
Listen to this article0:00 min
Share this article:
Jury Finds Live Nation and Ticketmaster Violated Antitrust Laws
AI-generated illustration

Fans who bought concert tickets from Live Nation-Ticketmaster between May 2020 and 2024 were overcharged, according to a jury verdict that could reshape how much people pay for shows, how venues are booked, and how much leverage artists have over the biggest player in live music.

After a five-week trial in Manhattan federal court and four days of deliberations, the jury found Live Nation and Ticketmaster liable for violating antitrust laws in a case brought in 2024 by the U.S. Department of Justice and 30 state and district attorneys general. Jurors also found that consumers were overcharged on tickets sold during that period, with reporting indicating the overcharge was calculated at $1.72 per ticket. The case now returns to Judge Arun Subramanian for decisions on damages, penalties, restitution and possible injunctive relief.

The verdict strikes at the core of Live Nation’s business model. In its complaint, the Justice Department said the company’s dominance across the live concert ecosystem deprived fans of ticketing innovation and forced them to use outdated technology while paying more than fans in other countries. State attorneys general argued at trial that Live Nation controlled 78% of the large amphitheaters used by artists and, through Ticketmaster, 86% of primary ticketing at major concert venues. That reach affects more than checkout screens. It influences which tours get promoted, which buildings get used, and how much bargaining power artists and smaller promoters have when they try to bring shows to market.

California Attorney General Rob Bonta called the verdict a “historic and resounding victory for artists, fans, and the venues that support them,” underscoring the wider consumer stakes. If the ruling stands, remedies could range from monetary penalties and restitution to court orders that change how the company operates. Live Nation could face structural relief, including possible divestiture of Ticketmaster, though such breakup remedies are rare and the company is expected to appeal.

The case also reopened a fight that has shadowed the merger for more than a decade. Live Nation and Ticketmaster completed their merger on January 25, 2010, after receiving regulatory clearances, even as the Justice Department warned the combination could substantially lessen competition in primary ticketing. The merger agreement required licensing Ticketmaster host platform software to Anschutz Entertainment Group, divestiture of Paciolan and behavioral restrictions meant to preserve competition. Ticketmaster, founded in 1976, said at the time that it sold more than 141 million tickets in 2008 and operated in 20 global markets.

The broader political backdrop sharpened the pressure on the company. The Justice Department reached a settlement with Live Nation after trial began, but a bipartisan coalition of state attorneys general rejected it and kept pressing forward. For fans, the verdict raises the possibility of a market with more ticketing competition, less venue lockup and fewer fees embedded in the price of seeing a show.

Know something we missed? Have a correction or additional information?

Submit a Tip

Never miss a story.
Get Prism News updates weekly.

The top stories delivered to your inbox.

Free forever · Unsubscribe anytime

Discussion

More in Business