Newcastle’s £124m striker rebuild still fails to solve Isak exit
Newcastle spent £124m on two new forwards, yet William Osula still started ahead of them as the club searched for a true successor to Alexander Isak.

Newcastle United have poured £124m into replacing Alexander Isak, but the spending has not yet produced a settled answer in attack. Nick Woltemade arrived in a club-record £69m move and Yoane Wissa followed for £55m, yet Eddie Howe still found himself rotating between Wissa, Woltemade and William Osula rather than naming a clear first-choice striker.
The scale of the rebuild underlines how much Newcastle have tried to cover the loss of Isak, who joined from Real Sociedad in August 2022 for about £60m before later moving on to Liverpool for a British-record fee. Isak had become Newcastle’s main goalscorer and the focal point of Howe’s attack, so his exit left a gap that money alone has not quickly filled. Wissa and Woltemade were meant to solve different parts of the problem: later analysis has described Wissa as a more traditional number nine, while Woltemade brings a taller, more technical profile.

Instead, Newcastle’s recent team choices have suggested uncertainty rather than finality. Howe has said he does not pick the team “based on transfer fees,” and when he explained a surprise selection he said it came down to what he saw in training rather than price tags. That approach has already been tested by the evidence on the pitch, where Osula has been preferred in some matches despite the combined £124m spent on the new arrivals.
The club’s own messaging showed it expected a replacement to arrive, even if the timing was messy. Howe said Newcastle’s owners would not leave the Premier League club without a recognised striker if the Isak saga ended in his exit, a promise that framed the summer as a search for cover as much as a statement signing spree. Yet the need to keep rotating and experimenting has made clear that Newcastle have not yet found the right balance up front.
That is what makes this more than a simple spending story. Newcastle did not just spend heavily; they spent on two forwards with different strengths, then still had to live with a lineup that lacked a settled No 9. For a club trying to build around St James’ Park ambitions and Champions League-level expectations, the Isak exit has exposed a deeper recruitment problem: Newcastle were quick to buy, but slower to define the striker profile that their team actually needed.
Know something we missed? Have a correction or additional information?
Submit a Tip

