Politics

Senate ruling blocks Trump ballroom security funding in GOP bill

A Senate referee killed $1 billion in ballroom-related security funding, forcing Republicans to rewrite a bill that had counted on White House and Secret Service upgrades.

Lisa Park··2 min read
Published
Listen to this article0:00 min
Share this article:
Senate ruling blocks Trump ballroom security funding in GOP bill
Source: thehill.com

A Senate rules ruling has derailed a $1 billion attempt to fold Trump White House ballroom security into a GOP budget bill, underscoring how a parliamentarian can halt even high-dollar ambitions when lawmakers run up against reconciliation limits.

Democrats said Saturday night that Senate parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough found the provision did not comply with budget rules. The money was tied to Secret Service security upgrades for the White House and Donald Trump’s planned ballroom, and Democrats argued it violated the Byrd rule because the Senate Judiciary Committee lacked jurisdiction over a project that touched White House construction and building-related oversight.

AI-generated illustration
AI-generated illustration

The disputed language would have allowed spending on “security adjustments and upgrades” inside the White House compound, including above-ground and below-ground security features, while barring spending on non-security items. Republicans said they were revising the legislation after the ruling. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said Democrats had blocked an effort to make taxpayers cover Trump’s ballroom and would try again if Republicans restored the language.

The fight was wrapped into a broader GOP reconciliation bill designed to fund immigration enforcement agencies for the next three years. Top Department of Homeland Security and Secret Service officials, including DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin and Secret Service Director Sean Curran, said the money was needed because of threats against the president and other public officials, and that it would also support other missions, including securing frequently visited venues. Democrats rejected that logic as too broad for a narrow, filibuster-proof budget bill.

The security fight grew out of a separate push from Senate Republicans Lindsey Graham, Katie Britt and Eric Schmitt, who introduced legislation to authorize a secure 90,000-square-foot White House ballroom after a gunman tried to storm the White House Correspondents’ Association dinner in April. That earlier proposal relied on about $400 million in private donations for construction, while the later reconciliation language sought up to $1 billion in taxpayer-backed security spending. Some Republicans, including Rick Scott and Rand Paul, questioned whether public money should touch the project at all. Paul said he expected the funding to come out of the budget bill and favored private donations instead.

The project had already moved beyond politics and into the physical landscape. The White House East Wing had been demolished to make room for the ballroom, and U.S. District Judge Richard Leon temporarily halted construction in March 2026 unless Congress approved it. The latest ruling showed the real boundary of reconciliation: it can move money quickly, but it cannot easily be stretched to cover a politically charged White House overhaul when Senate rules decide the bill has gone too far.

Know something we missed? Have a correction or additional information?

Submit a Tip

Never miss a story.

Get Prism News updates weekly. The top stories delivered to your inbox.

Free forever · Unsubscribe anytime

Discussion

More in Politics