Sterling Ranch seeks rezoning for up to 4,000 homes
A major amendment for Sterling Ranch was accepted Dec. 3 proposing rezoning 595 acres for up to 4,000 units; public hearings have begun and county decision follows.

A substantial zoning application tied to Sterling Ranch moved forward in Douglas County planning records, proposing to rezone roughly 595 acres to Planned Development and add up to 4,000 housing units. The application, filed as ZR2025-014 and identified as the 15th Amendment to the Sterling Ranch Planned Development, was accepted by county planners on Dec. 3, 2025. The planning process entered the public hearing phase earlier this month and now heads to the Board of County Commissioners for final consideration.
The Planning Commission held its hearing on Jan. 12, 2026 to review the amendment; the Board of County Commissioners is scheduled to hear the application on Jan. 27, 2026. County records list Brett Thomas as the staff contact for the project and identify SR WATERTON LLC and Sterling Ranch as applicant and owner. The project record includes application materials and meeting documents available for public review and comment as part of the formal review process.
At roughly 6.7 units per acre based on the application totals, the proposal represents a notable increase in housing density for the acreage in question. That scale of development carries direct policy implications for local infrastructure - including roads, water and sewer capacity, schools, and emergency services - and will factor into the county’s technical reviews and conditions should the amendment be approved. The Planned Development zoning mechanism allows the county and developer to negotiate site-specific standards for density, setbacks, land use mix and public amenities, making the hearings a key point for shaping those tradeoffs.
Institutionally, the Planning Commission’s review provides advisory findings and recommendations; the Board of County Commissioners has the authority to approve, deny or condition the amendment. Commissioners’ votes will determine whether the county accepts the change in land use and the accompanying developer commitments. For residents, the decision is consequential: it affects long-term growth patterns, tax base composition, and the county’s capacity to deliver services without additional revenue or capital investment.

Civic engagement opportunities remain central in the coming days. The formal hearing schedule gives residents and stakeholders a chance to submit written comments and address the Planning Commission and Board at public hearings. County materials identify the project contacts and list documents that explain the proposal’s scope and proposed conditions in detail.
What happens on Jan. 27 will signal how Douglas County balances growth pressures with infrastructure and service priorities. Residents directly affected by Sterling Ranch expansion should review the project materials, engage with county staff, and consider participating in the remaining public process to make local policy outcomes reflect community priorities.
Sources:
Know something we missed? Have a correction or additional information?
Submit a Tip

