Terror commander allegedly discussed targeting Ivanka Trump, DOJ says
Federal prosecutors charged a Kata’ib Hizballah commander as NBC News reported he discussed targeting Ivanka Trump in Florida, though that claim was not in court papers.
Federal prosecutors indicted Mohammad Baqer Saad Dawood Al-Saadi on eight terrorism-related counts and said he helped drive nearly 20 attacks and attempted attacks across Europe, Canada and the United States. The case, filed in Manhattan, centers on allegations that the commander or senior member of Kata’ib Hizballah furthered the goals of the militia and Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps since at least 2017.
The Justice Department said Al-Saadi was extradited to the United States and presented before U.S. Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn in Manhattan federal court, where he was ordered detained pending trial. The indictment and public releases accuse him of directing others to attack U.S. bank branches, target Jewish people in multiple European cities and pursue a plot against a New York City synagogue. Prosecutors also say the case involves attacks and attempted attacks in Europe, Canada and the United States.
A separate allegation raised by NBC News adds another layer to the case. The network reported, citing three sources familiar with the matter, that Al-Saadi discussed targeting Ivanka Trump in Florida as part of a series of attacks. That claim was not included in the indictment or the Justice Department’s public release, a distinction that matters in a case that blends charged crimes, intelligence reporting and the limits of what prosecutors have put before the court.
Al-Saadi was first arrested and charged by the Justice Department on May 15, 2026, then indicted on May 28. Court documents describe Kata’ib Hizballah as a U.S.-designated foreign terrorist organization operating in Iraq, and the Justice Department said Al-Saadi was involved in nearly 20 attacks and attempted attacks dating back to at least 2017. Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche said Al-Saadi had been directly involved in terrorist operations and military decisions to attack U.S. and Israeli interests and that the department looked forward to prosecuting him in an American courtroom.
The case underscores how federal investigators frame high-profile targeting plots: not as isolated threats, but as part of a broader operational campaign tied to a designated militant network. It also shows the burden on protective intelligence agencies when alleged threats involve public figures, religious sites and international targets at once, with the strongest allegations still needing to be tested in court.
This article was produced by Prism’s automated news system from verified source data, official records, and press releases, then run through automated quality and moderation checks before publishing. The system is built and supervised by the people who set the standards it runs under. Read our full AI policy.
Did this article answer your question?
