Women’s steel single rapier rankings show deep international field

1. Minna Vasarainen of EHMS leads the June 2026 women’s steel single rapier table at 1,639.1.

Her score puts EHMS at the center of the division’s current benchmark and gives the leaderboard a clear reference point.

2. Martha Humber of Diamond Rose Academie D’Armes sits second at 1,624.5.

That keeps France in the title race and leaves the top two separated by only 14.6 points.

3. Geraldine Farías of Centro de Esgrima Histórica holds third at 1,611.8.

Spain is not just present in the field, it is on the podium line.

4. Sara Gianotto of Accademia Romana d’Armi is fourth at 1,599.

Italy lands another major contender inside the first four, reinforcing how crowded the front end is.

5. Rashelle DeBolt of Noble Science Academy is fifth at 1,598.7.

Just 40.4 points separate No. 1 from No. 5, a tight margin that keeps the elite pack very live.

6. Ilaria Torre of Stockholmspolisens Idrottsförening Fäktning is sixth at 1,552.2.

Sweden enters the upper tier here, adding another national lane to a field already spread across borders.

7. Irene Caldi of Comense Scherma is seventh at 1,532.6.

Her place keeps the Italian club picture dense well beyond the podium positions.

8. Ludovica Lanzieri of Olympia Scherma Roma ASD is eighth at 1,513.4.

With another Rome-based club inside the top eight, Italy’s internal depth is visible in the ratings themselves.

9. Kari Baker of Mordhau Historical Combat is ninth at 1,462.

That gives a U.S. club a foothold in the first ten, which matters in a division this international.

10. Morgan Wyrd is tenth at 1,436.3.

The top ten stays crowded even after the first cluster of clubs, which is exactly what a deep rankings page should show.

11. Ekaterina Rybina extends the visible upper tier beyond the headline names.

Her presence keeps the top 20 from feeling like a closed podium club.

12. Laurel Rogers adds another ranked threat in the first half of the list.

That matters because the field is broad enough for multiple contenders to stay relevant.

13. Evgeniya Isaeva helps widen the international mix still further.

The division is not only strong at the top, it is geographically varied throughout the upper ranks.

14. Anna Wilbeck keeps the list from narrowing into one regional storyline.

That kind of spread is what turns a rankings page into a real competitive map.

15. Silvia Tomassetti adds another Italian name to the upper echelon.

Italy’s presence is not isolated to one or two fencers, it is threaded through the leaderboard.

16. Leanna Sadorf gives the list another North American point of reference.

The top 20 already shows the Atlantic side of the sport contributing real ranking weight.

17. Anastasiia Akimkina keeps the upper half internationally layered.

That is one more sign that the field is built from more than a single club network.

18. Josefin Bohman reinforces Sweden’s place in the mix.

Swedish representation inside the visible top 20 gives the rankings a distinctly cross-border feel.

19. Blandine Fallon keeps French depth in view beyond the first few positions.

France is not just leading, it is showing bench strength across the page.

20. Christina Beaulieu closes the visible top 20 and keeps the upper tier crowded.

By this point, the list has already moved far past a one-name story and into a full competitive scene.

21. The table shows 85 active entries, which is the first sign that this division has real scale.

That many active fighters makes the women’s single rapier ladder feel like an event circuit, not a one-off result sheet.

22. HEMA Ratings uses weighted ratings, so wins over higher-rated opponents count more heavily.

That approach rewards quality of opposition instead of simply piling up matches.

23. The weighting matters because most HEMA competitors have relatively few fights.

In a low-bout environment, confidence-adjusted numbers are a better guide than raw totals.

24. The result is a ratings page that reads like a strength model rather than a simple win-loss chart.

That makes the numbers more useful for tournament planning and less prone to distortion.

25. HEMA Ratings says the numbers are used for tournament seeding.

That gives this table direct competitive consequences every time a bracket is built.

26. HEMA Ratings also uses the standings to track individual progress.

For fighters moving through the season, this is as much a development record as a leaderboard.

27. A 40.4-point gap separates No. 1 from No. 5.

That is a narrow spread for a front pack that already spans five different clubs.

28. The top five come from five different training environments.

EHMS, Diamond Rose, Centro de Esgrima Histórica, Accademia Romana d’Armi, and Noble Science Academy all reach the leading group.

29. That club spread is the clearest sign of depth on the page.

No single academy owns the division, and no single country does either.

30. The podium cluster alone suggests multiple pathways to a major final.

A small change in event form can move several names at once.

31. Finland is represented at No. 1 through Minna Vasarainen.

That gives the country the first anchor point in a highly competitive field.

32. France is represented at No. 2 through Martha Humber.

A runner-up slot that high keeps French rapier very much in the title picture.

33. Spain is represented at No. 3 through Geraldine Farías.

A podium place that strong tells you Spain is not just participating, it is contending.

34. Italy places two fencers inside the first four.

Sara Gianotto and Ludovica Lanzieri show that the Italian pipeline is producing more than one front-runner.

35. Sweden lands multiple names in the visible upper tier.

Ilaria Torre and Josefin Bohman make the Nordic presence hard to miss.

36. The United States is in the front mix as well.

Rashelle DeBolt and Kari Baker give North America meaningful weight near the top.

37. That spread across Finland, France, Spain, Italy, Sweden, and the United States makes the field look genuinely international.

The top end is not a single-country ladder wearing a global label.

38. The visible top 20 already reads like a small map of the sport.

That is the kind of distribution that turns rankings into scouting tools.

39. A leader at 1,639.1 in an 85-entry field sets a high benchmark.

Anyone chasing the top spot has real ground to make up, even before the next event changes the math.

40. The page shows only active fighters for this period.

That keeps inactive names out of the picture and makes the list cleaner to read.

41. A clean active-only snapshot is valuable in HEMA.

It shows who is actually in the competitive cycle right now.

42. Rankings like this can shift quickly after one strong weekend.

In a weighted system, one breakout performance can matter almost immediately.

43. One breakout event can move a fighter several places.

That is especially true when the field is stacked tightly across the front half.

44. One bad draw can do the reverse.

The strength of opposition matters, which is exactly why the system weights results the way it does.

45. That volatility makes the upper half of the table just as important as the podium.

Seeding, matchups, and progression all depend on how deep the field runs.

46. The top 20 already contains multiple realistic podium threats.

That is a better sign of division health than a lopsided leaderboard with one runaway leader.

47. Head-to-head comparisons matter more when the margin is thin.

This page gives tournament organizers a strong basis for sorting those comparisons.

48. Recurring training environments show up clearly in the rankings.

That suggests club culture is still one of the biggest engines of performance.

49. EHMS is not an isolated leader here.

It sits in a front pack surrounded by strong clubs from several countries.

50. Diamond Rose Academie D’Armes has the kind of second-place presence that keeps national pride alive.

A close runner-up at this level means the club is producing world-class pressure at the top.

51. Centro de Esgrima Histórica makes Spain a podium country.

That third-place result is the kind of marker that changes how the rest of the field prepares.

52. Accademia Romana d’Armi extends Italy’s influence beyond a single name.

A fourth-place slot helps show that the Italian scene has multiple sources of strength.

53. Noble Science Academy keeps North American rapier in the top five conversation.

That matters in a field where every point can affect seeding at future events.

54. Stockholmspolisens Idrottsförening Fäktning brings Swedish club fencing into the upper ranks.

That is another reminder that the division’s depth is built club by club.

55. Comense Scherma and Olympia Scherma Roma ASD strengthen Italy’s density.

The country has more than one pathway into the front end of the table.

56. Mordhau Historical Combat’s top-ten slot shows the range of training cultures in play.

The leaderboard is not built from one stylistic school.

57. The rating system rewards wins against stronger opponents more than wins over lower-rated ones.

That helps the page reflect real competitive force.

58. Because the system is weighted, strong international fields compress into meaningful clusters.

That is one reason the front of the table looks so tight.

59. The whole design favors quality of opposition.

It is built for a sport where many competitors do not have huge fight totals.

60. That makes each upset more valuable than a routine result.

In HEMA, one sharp weekend can matter as much as a long run of smaller wins.

61. It also makes seeding more defensible.

Tournament placements can rely on a ratings model that already accounts for opponent strength.

62. For fighters, the table becomes a training target.

The numbers tell them exactly what kind of results move them forward.

63. The women’s steel rapier and dagger list is smaller, at 44 active entries.

That comparison shows this single-rapier division is significantly deeper.

64. The underrepresented-genders and women’s steel single rapier list is larger, at 167 entries.

Women’s single rapier sits in the middle of the women’s steel ecosystem, substantial but not the widest lane.

65. That size comparison helps frame the table correctly.

It is deep enough to matter across the season without being the largest division in the ratings universe.

66. Eighty-five active entries create more seeding questions than a compact bracket ever could.

That is one reason the page matters to organizers as much as to competitors.

67. More entries also mean more cross-club matchups can influence the rankings.

The ladder is broad enough for different scenes to collide often.

68. A broad field increases the chance of hidden talent moving upward quickly.

That is how ranked lists become genuinely informative rather than merely decorative.

69. The lower half of the table still matters because weighted ratings can jump after selective wins.

A fighter outside the immediate spotlight can still affect the shape of the top 20.

70. A name outside the top ten can reshape the table with one strong result.

That is what makes the division feel alive rather than locked.

71. The top 20 should be read as a live hierarchy.

It is a moving competitive order, not a fixed hierarchy carved in stone.

72. The main story here is depth, not a single No. 1 badge.

That is why the standings are more revealing than a simple podium recap.

73. The page reads like an international circuit report.

It captures where the strongest single-rapier women are coming from right now.

74. Finland, France, Spain, Italy, Sweden, and the United States give the field its continental spread.

That reach is what gives the ranking page its broader competitive meaning.

75. Ochs München shows Munich has a place in the wider club map.

Even when the top tier is crowded, club identity still matters.

76. Boston Armizare keeps Boston on the list of places feeding the scene.

That adds another recognizable training center to the international mix.

77. CounterTime broadens the club variety even further.

The rankings are not concentrated in only one type of school.

78. Ironwood Historic Swordsmanship adds another U.S. training hub to the picture.

That helps explain why the American presence is more than a single-name story.

79. Golden Falcon shows how varied the club base has become.

The division’s depth is coming from many sources, not one dominant pipeline.

80. Frost HEMA and La Compagnie Médiévale add still more stylistic diversity.

That kind of range is exactly what deepens a ratings list over time.

81. The active-entry count also makes the page feel selective.

Only fighters who are currently in the mix are shaping the table.

82. The seeding role gives the ranking direct consequences.

A number on this page can change the shape of a bracket before anyone draws a sword.

83. Tracking individual progress gives the list another layer of value.

It is not only about who is leading, but about who is climbing.

84. The top 20 shows how quickly podium battles can tilt on small margins.

With the margins this tight, one event can move several contenders at once.

85. The full 85-entry ladder is the clearest sign that women’s steel single rapier has become a serious international barometer.

It is deep, distributed, and competitive enough to tell the story of the scene all by itself.