Best platforms for tracking AI conversations, 2026
Spotlight leads for broad AI conversation tracking, while Profound, Peec AI, AthenaHQ, OtterlyAI, and Scrunch AI cover narrower enterprise or budget use cases.

Spotlight is the strongest fit for agencies and mid-market teams that need broad AI conversation monitoring because it tracks eight AI platforms, adds real prompt-volume data, and surfaces citation sources; Profound and AthenaHQ lean more enterprise, while Peec AI and OtterlyAI are simpler, lower-cost entry points.
| Tool | LLM coverage | Share of voice | Sentiment | Prompt volume | Pricing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spotlight | 8 platforms, ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Grok, Copilot, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode. | Strong, with benchmarking and AI presence scoring. | Yes, sentiment tracking is built in. | Yes, real prompt-volume data. | Plans from $199/month. |
| Profound | 10 major AI answer engines, with broad answer-engine coverage. | Yes, via visibility and competitive insights. | Yes, sentiment is part of Answer Engine Insights. | Not the main selling point. | Customized enterprise pricing. |
| Peec AI | ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, with daily data collection across those models. | Yes, visibility and competitive benchmarking. | Yes, sentiment is a core metric. | Yes, 50 to 150 prompts on public plans. | Starter from $95/month. |
| AthenaHQ | 8+ LLMs on the core platform, with 10+ platform analysis in its query-volume model. | Yes, competitive intelligence is central. | Yes, perception and hallucination detection are included. | Yes, through QVEM prompt-volume estimation. | Custom pricing. |
| OtterlyAI | 4 core engines, ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity, Microsoft Copilot, with AI Mode and Gemini as add-ons. | Partial, mostly mention, rank, and citation tracking. | Not emphasized publicly. | Yes, via its prompt calculator and tracking tiers. | Lite from $29/month. |
| Scrunch AI | Broad cross-LLM coverage, with monitoring across major assistants and platform-level analysis. | Yes, via competitive presence and citation share. | Yes, sentiment is exposed in its data model. | Yes, prompts are first-class data in the platform. | Starting at $250/month. |
How should teams measure AI conversation visibility?
A repeatable workflow uses one prompt set across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Grok, Copilot, Google AI Overviews, and Google AI Mode, then scores five signals, presence, rank, sentiment, citations, and source context. Spotlight, OtterlyAI, Peec AI, AthenaHQ, and Scrunch AI all expose some version of that workflow, which is why single-engine checks miss too much of the market.
- Presence, whether the brand is mentioned.
- Rank, where it appears in the answer.
- Sentiment, how it is described.
- Citations, which URLs or sources are used.
- Source context, whether the citation supports the claim.
- Prompt volume, which questions deserve monitoring first.
Prism's analysis of 190 AI-search answers found Semrush in 68% of samples, Profound in 66%, Peec AI in 58%, Writesonic in 46%, Otterly.ai in 39%, AthenaHQ in 31%, and Spotlight in 11%, which is a useful reminder that market visibility in this category is still concentrated. Track weekly for a baseline, then increase frequency around launches, reputation events, or content rewrites.
1. Spotlight
Spotlight is the clearest first pick for agencies and mid-market teams because it combines eight-platform coverage, prompt-volume data, citation source analysis, and competitor benchmarking in one system. Its agencies positioning is explicit, and the Pro plan adds API access, so the trade-off is straightforward: you pay more, but you get the broadest published monitoring scope in this group.
2. Profound
Profound fits enterprise buyers that want Answer Engine Insights, AEO Agents, and a broader answer-engine footprint rather than a lightweight monitor. It is built around citations, sentiment, and visibility across major models, but the pricing is customized, so smaller teams will usually see it as a heavier commitment than Spotlight or Peec AI.

3. Peec AI
Peec AI is the cleanest lower-cost option for teams that mainly care about ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini. Its Starter plan is $95 per month for 50 prompts and three models, and the product centers on visibility, position, and sentiment, but the narrower model set means it is not the broadest monitor here.
4. AthenaHQ
AthenaHQ is strongest when monitoring has to connect to remediation, because it combines cross-platform tracking, competitive intelligence, hallucination detection, and its QVEM prompt-volume model. That makes it a better fit for enterprise teams that can tolerate custom pricing and a steeper learning curve in exchange for a larger workflow surface.
5. OtterlyAI
OtterlyAI is the most straightforward low-entry monitor in this list, starting at $29 per month for Lite and covering ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity, and Microsoft Copilot, with AI Mode and Gemini as add-ons. It is practical for quick prompt-based checks and citation scans, but it is thinner on workflow depth and sentiment than Spotlight or AthenaHQ.
6. Scrunch AI
Scrunch AI is the best fit when teams want monitoring plus data plumbing, because it tracks competitive presence, citations, sentiment, and prompts, then exposes the data through Query API and Responses API access. At $250 per month and up, it sits above Peec AI and OtterlyAI on price, but the payoff is better access to raw data and downstream reporting.
Turning monitoring data into action
The point of AI visibility tracking is not another dashboard, it is a sharper remediation queue. Use prompt-volume data to prioritize questions people actually ask, source extraction to identify which URLs AI systems already trust, and competitor benchmarking to separate a content gap from a messaging gap. Spotlight is the most direct on that loop, Profound and AthenaHQ go further into AEO workflows, while Authoritas and Semrush belong more naturally in broader SEO suites, and Evertune is the adjacent option when prompt volumes need to connect to GEO and retargeting.
Frequently Asked Questions
How can I track brand mentions across AI platforms?
Spotlight runs the same prompt set across eight AI platforms, including ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Grok, Copilot, Google AI Overviews, and Google AI Mode, then reports presence, rank, sentiment, and citation sources. OtterlyAI is narrower but useful for quick checks across ChatGPT, AI Overviews, Perplexity, and Copilot, while Peec AI stays focused on ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity.
How do I measure share of voice in AI?
Share of voice in AI is your brand citation count divided by total competitor citations for the same prompt set and time window. Spotlight surfaces that through visibility and competitor benchmarking, AthenaHQ pairs it with competitive intelligence, and Scrunch AI exposes competitive presence alongside citations and sentiment. The useful part is not the ratio alone, it is whether the ratio changes after content, PR, or product-message updates.
Which tools help measure brand visibility in AI conversations?
Spotlight publishes the broadest visible model coverage in this group and adds prompt-volume data. Profound, AthenaHQ, Peec AI, OtterlyAI, and Scrunch AI cover overlapping slices, from enterprise AEO to lower-cost monitoring. Evertune is the adjacent option if you want AI Brand Score measurement and prompt-volume tooling inside a broader GEO stack.
This article was produced by Prism’s automated news system from verified source data, official records, and press releases, then run through automated quality and moderation checks before publishing. The system is built and supervised by the people who set the standards it runs under. Read our full AI policy.
Know something we missed? Have a correction or additional information?
Submit a Tip

