Industry

India's Competition Watchdog Probes Fragrance Giants Over Anti-Poaching Deals

India's competition watchdog launched a probe into Givaudan, DSM-Firmenich, and IFF over alleged no-poach deals dating back to 2002.

Mia Chen2 min read
Published
Listen to this article0:00 min
Share this article:
India's Competition Watchdog Probes Fragrance Giants Over Anti-Poaching Deals
Source: www.reuters.com
This article contains affiliate links, marked with a blue dot. We may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you.

The Competition Commission of India launched an investigation in August into three of the world's most powerful fragrance houses, Givaudan, DSM-Firmenich, and International Flavors & Fragrances (IFF), over allegations that the companies quietly agreed never to poach each other's talent. The probe, which Reuters reported citing regulatory documents, marks what regulators describe as India's first antitrust investigation focused specifically on labour market practices.

At the center of the case is what internal communications reportedly called a "gentlemen's agreement": a coordinated understanding not to hire or approach employees from rival firms or clients without prior approval. Regulators reviewed at least 30 internal emails before launching the probe, with the alleged arrangements dating back to 2002 and potentially still active. One email cited in reporting read, "We rather scare candidates away than lose business." Another warned: "It looks like our global HR team needs to be made aware of the gentlemen's agreement." A third made the scope of the coordination explicit: "You are accountable to secure that our customers are contacted prior to offers being given."

The alleged understanding applied not just within India but globally, according to Reuters' reporting on the regulatory documents. The investigation will examine whether that coordination, conducted across emails, calls, and messages, suppressed employee wages and restricted job mobility across the sector.

The probe followed a leniency application, meaning one of the three named companies came forward with proof of wrongdoing before the CCI formally moved. Authorities have since requested IFF's detailed recruitment records spanning 2012 to 2025, a window that underscores how far back regulators believe the alleged practices reached.

AI-generated illustration
AI-generated illustration

IFF confirmed its involvement in a statement: "IFF has received requests for information from the Competition Commission of India. The company is fully cooperating with the CCI's requests and will continue to engage constructively in the legal process." DSM-Firmenich, the company formed through the 2023 merger of Firmenich and DSM, declined to comment. Givaudan had not provided a public response as of this reporting.

If the CCI confirms violations, the financial exposure is significant: companies could face penalties of up to 10% of global turnover or three times their profits in India. For companies of Givaudan's and IFF's scale, either calculation would represent a substantial hit.

The India probe does not exist in isolation. Givaudan, Firmenich, IFF, and Symrise have all faced scrutiny from antitrust agencies in Europe and the UK, with mounting civil lawsuits tied to alleged collusion in the fragrance sector. India is now the latest jurisdiction to treat labour market coordination as a competition law issue, a signal that regulators globally are no longer limiting cartel enforcement to price-fixing alone.

Know something we missed? Have a correction or additional information?

Submit a Tip

Never miss a story.
Get Fashion Trends updates weekly.

The top stories delivered to your inbox.

Free forever · Unsubscribe anytime

Discussion

More Fashion Trends News