Namita Thapar Sparks Debate by Comparing Namaz and Yoga Benefits
Namita Thapar’s namaz post set off a sharp split online after she linked prayer movements to yoga and cited digestion, posture, focus and stress relief.

Namita Thapar, the Shark Tank India judge and Emcure Pharmaceuticals executive director, ignited a broad online debate after posting about namaz’s health benefits and comparing the prayer’s movements with yoga postures such as Vajrasana. The reaction was immediate, with thousands of likes and comments and a mix of praise and criticism as the video spread across platforms.
The post was shared after Thapar celebrated Eid with friends. In her remarks, she described namaz as both a spiritual practice and a routine that, in her view, can support digestion, posture, circulation, mental focus, stress reduction and lower cortisol. Another account said she also framed the practice as a pause in a busy day and a way to strengthen community connection, a combination that made the message land well beyond ordinary lifestyle chatter.
That visibility mattered. Thapar is not just a wellness influencer or casual commentator; she is a public business figure with a health-industry role, which made her comments easy to scrutinize and hard to dismiss. One report dated the post March 27, 2026, while other coverage picked it up in early April, after the clip had already begun moving widely online and drawing mixed responses.
The dispute quickly turned from personality to evidence. Yoga has a far clearer public-health case behind it. The World Health Organization has highlighted yoga’s physical and mental health benefits, and the National Health Service says yoga focuses on strength, flexibility and breathing, with evidence it can help with stress, depression, high blood pressure, heart disease, aches and pains, and lower back pain. A recent meta-analysis also suggests yoga may be an option for lowering blood pressure, though it says more and larger high-quality studies are still needed.
Prayer research is less settled. One PubMed-indexed paper found improved standing dynamic balance among adult healthy subjects practicing Islamic prayer regimes, suggesting that some physical effects may be real when the movements are performed correctly. But another review of prayer studies found results ranging from improvement to no effect or even worsening outcomes, a reminder that spiritual practice and medical benefit are not the same claim.
That is the fault line running through the backlash to Thapar’s post. Few people disputed the value of namaz as worship, but many pushed back on any suggestion of scientific equivalence with yoga. In a country where religion, wellness and public health increasingly overlap, her post became a test case for a simple distinction: cultural respect can be real without turning every shared posture into a medical equal.
Know something we missed? Have a correction or additional information?
Submit a Tip

