Federal Jury Finds City of Eugene Not Liable in 2019 Shooting
A federal jury returned a verdict for the City of Eugene on November 26, 2025 in a wrongful death suit arising from the November 30, 2019 shooting of Eliborio Rodrigues Jr. Jurors apportioned fault between Eugene Police Officer Sam Tykol and Rodrigues, finding Rodrigues 55 percent at fault and Tykol 45 percent, which means the plaintiffs will not receive damages.

A Lane County federal jury concluded a seven day trial by finding the City of Eugene not liable for the death of Eliborio Rodrigues Jr., resolving a high profile civil claim tied to a 2019 police shooting. The plaintiffs were Rodrigues family members, his widow and children, who sought damages alleging excessive force and negligence by Officer Sam Tykol. The jury assigned greater responsibility to Rodrigues and therefore denied monetary relief to the family.
The trial focused on body camera footage and witness testimony describing the encounter on November 30, 2019. According to trial evidence, Officer Tykol initially stopped Rodrigues as he collected bottles in a roadway. The officer attempted to use pepper spray, and a physical struggle followed. Tykol testified his body camera detached during the struggle. He said Rodrigues overpowered him and attempted to use a taser, prompting Tykol to fire three close range shots. Rodrigues died at the scene.

Jurors weighed competing questions about whether Tykol reasonably feared for his life, whether drugs in Rodrigues system affected his behavior, and whether officers on scene should have used de escalation tactics or waited for backup. Prior to the civil trial, a county district attorney investigation had concluded the shooting was justified. Officer Tykol remains employed by the Eugene Police Department.
For local residents the verdict carries immediate legal finality but broader policy implications. The outcome ends this particular civil avenue of accountability while leaving intact questions about department policies on de escalation, backup procedures, body camera retention and officer training. The presence of body camera footage that was interrupted mid encounter underscores technological and procedural vulnerabilities that can shape both public understanding and legal outcomes.
City officials and police leadership will face renewed scrutiny from community groups and policymakers about whether current oversight structures and training practices sufficiently address risk in volatile encounters. The decision is likely to influence public debate about policing and may shape civic engagement in future discussions about public safety, oversight, and municipal policy in Eugene.
Sources:
Know something we missed? Have a correction or additional information?
Submit a Tip

