Oregon Newspapers Urge Gov. Kotek to Veto Public Meetings Bill
More than 50 Oregon newspapers, including the Eugene Weekly and The Chronicle, called on Gov. Tina Kotek to veto a bill they say guts the state's open meetings law.

More than 50 Oregon newspapers, including two Lane County outlets, published editorials calling on Gov. Tina Kotek to veto House Bill 4177, arguing the measure would gut the state's long-revered Public Meetings Law and allow governing bodies to gather information outside public view.
The Register-Guard was among the first to go on record, publishing its editorial on March 6. Eugene Weekly and The Chronicle, which covers Springfield, Cottage Grove, Creswell, and Pleasant Hill, joined the effort alongside papers ranging from the Bend Bulletin and The Oregonian to the Cottage Grove Sentinel and the Siuslaw News in Florence.

The editorials share nearly identical language, describing HB 4177 as "an ill-advised measure approved by the Oregon Legislature that undermines Oregon's long-revered Public Meetings Law." The coordinated push appears to involve the Oregon Newspaper Publishers Association, whose member papers are listed across both the Eugene Weekly and Chronicle editorials.
At the core of the newspapers' objections is a procedural complaint: the work group that drafted HB 4177 excluded media organizations that had been central to creating Oregon's Public Meetings Law in 1973 and shaping its subsequent amendments. When Oregon Newspaper Publishers Association representatives finally gained access to the process, they reported finding a warning from the Oregon Government Ethics Commission about the bill, though the full text of that warning has not been made public.
The editorials also argue that the bill was rushed. "We believe, in passing HB 4177 during a short session, that the Oregon Legislature did not have full access to legal analysis about its consequences," The Chronicle wrote.
Both The Chronicle and Eugene Weekly framed Kotek as the appropriate figure to intervene, pointing to her record on transparency. "This is precisely the time, particularly by a governor who has championed open government through decades of Oregon public service, for a balancing veto," The Chronicle wrote, with the paper and its Oregon Newspaper Publishers Association partners pledging "full support on behalf of the Oregon public" for a veto.
As of publication, Gov. Kotek has not announced whether she will sign or veto HB 4177. Her decision will determine whether the bill's critics, who span every corner of Oregon's news landscape from the Burns Times-Herald to the World in Coos Bay, succeed in preserving the public meetings protections they helped write more than 50 years ago.
Know something we missed? Have a correction or additional information?
Submit a Tip

