Business

Trump administration backs stablecoin yield, escalating fight with banks

Trump is siding with crypto in a fight over stablecoin yield, while White House economists say banning it would barely help banks but would cost consumers $800 million a year.

Sarah Chen3 min read
Published
Listen to this article0:00 min
Share this article:
Trump administration backs stablecoin yield, escalating fight with banks
Source: rollingstone.com

The fight over stablecoin yield is turning into a fight over who gets to be America’s next savings account. President Donald Trump has backed crypto firms that want to pay returns on dollar-pegged tokens, a move that puts him against banks warning that deposits could drain away from insured accounts and into digital wallets.

The dispute centers on a basic question with big household stakes: should someone holding a payment stablecoin be able to earn interest-like rewards simply for parking cash there? Congress tried to draw a line in the GENIUS Act, passed in July 2025, by restricting issuers from paying interest, yield or rewards to holders. But the Congressional Research Service says the law left a gap in the common exchange-custody model, because it never defined “holder.” That leaves room for exchanges to offer rewards to retail users through economics funded by issuer reserve interest or marketing arrangements.

That loophole matters because the products now sit uncomfortably between bank deposits and money-market funds. Insured bank accounts come with federal protections, but generally pay lower rates. Money-market funds may offer better yields, but they are not insured deposits and can break the buck in stress. Stablecoins backed by Treasury bills or other reserves promise speed and dollar stability, yet they do not come with deposit insurance. Regulators, if they want to prevent runs, would need to pair any yield permission with clearer disclosure, tighter reserve rules, fast redemption rights, limits on affiliated reward programs and a clean definition of who counts as the customer.

Banks are pressing the hardest line. On Dec. 18, 2025, the American Bankers Association and 52 state bankers associations urged Congress to “clarify and enforce” GENIUS’s yield prohibition and close what they called a loophole that allows exchanges and platforms to offer yield-like incentives. The bankers argued the practice “risks disintermediating” deposits and could weaken lending capacity, especially for local communities.

AI-generated illustration
AI-generated illustration

Trump sharpened the politics on March 4, 2026, when he publicly backed the crypto industry and urged banks to “make a good deal with the Crypto Industry.” Markets read that as a clear signal: Coinbase shares rose as much as 15% intraday, while JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America each fell less than 1%.

The White House Council of Economic Advisers has now added fuel to the crypto side. In early April, its analysis said a stablecoin yield ban would increase bank lending by about $2.1 billion, or roughly 0.02% of total bank loans, while imposing about $800 million in consumer welfare costs each year. The CEA said prohibiting yield would do “very little” to protect lending, making the clash less about bank stability than about which institution gets to pay Americans the better rate.

The policy fight is also complicating broader crypto legislation, including the CLARITY Act. It has raised conflict-of-interest questions as well, because Trump and his family have reportedly generated hundreds of millions of dollars from crypto-related interests, including World Liberty Financial. For now, the stablecoin market is no longer just a payments debate. It is a contest over where Americans keep their cash, who gets the interest, and how much protection comes with it.

Know something we missed? Have a correction or additional information?

Submit a Tip

Never miss a story.
Get Prism News updates weekly.

The top stories delivered to your inbox.

Free forever · Unsubscribe anytime

Discussion

More in Business