News

Asian Pickleball Players Accused of Cheating in Match Against Alshon

Hoang Nam Ly's match-point call that eliminated No. 2 seed Christian Alshon at the PPA Hanoi Cup has sparked cheating accusations, reigniting debate over officiating in Asian pickleball.

David Kumar2 min read
Published
Listen to this article0:00 min
Share this article:
Asian Pickleball Players Accused of Cheating in Match Against Alshon
AI-generated illustration
This article contains affiliate links, marked with a blue dot. We may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you.

A match-point line call in Hanoi has become the most contested moment in Asian pickleball this season, with Vietnamese player Hoang Nam Ly at the center of a sportsmanship storm following his 12-10, 0-11, 12-10 upset of No. 2 seed Christian Alshon in the Round of 16 men's singles at the PPA Asia MB Hanoi Cup on April 2.

The pivotal moment came with Alshon serving at 11-10 in the deciding set: Ly called out a serve return from Alshon that video evidence suggests landed inside the line. Because the match was played on Grandstand Court, video replay was not available. The referee acknowledged the decision and awarded the victory to Ly. Alshon reacted negatively to his loss, insisting the ball was still in play, but could not change the result.

The Dink, one of pickleball's most prominent media outlets, analyzed the footage from multiple angles and concluded that Alshon's return appeared to land well in bounds, noting it was not particularly close. The publication also pointed out that the ball was a serve return traveling at a relatively slow speed, making it a more straightforward tracking call than a speed-up or overhead shot. The Dink stopped short of calling it intentional, stating it did not know whether the call was deliberate, but the footage circulating on social media drew sharper conclusions.

Online reaction was swift and divided. Many accounts accused Ly of cheating, claiming the ball was clearly inside the line. Others suggested the ball may have grazed the edge of the court, a genuinely sensitive position that can deceive even attentive players at full pace. With no video appeals mechanism available on Grandstand Court, no definitive determination could be reached, and the result stood.

There was added motivation on Ly's side. Alshon, ranked fourth on the PPA Tour, had beaten Ly 2-0, winning both games 11-7, in the semifinals of the 2025 Malaysia Cup just months earlier, and Ly arrived in Hanoi intent on settling that score. Having come through the qualifying rounds, the former Vietnamese No. 1 tennis player had already spent considerable energy before facing Alshon, rallying past compatriot Pham Xuan Vu 9-11, 11-6, 11-1 in the Round of 32.

Ly's victory over the second seed was the headline result of the opening day's main draw action. The third game went down to the wire, and the controversial final call sent the stadium loud and social media alight. Ly advanced to the quarterfinals, but the win has been largely eclipsed by the argument it produced.

The Hanoi incident is now a focal point for wider calls about officiating infrastructure at PPA Tour Asia events. As professional pickleball extends deeper into Southeast Asia, a single disputed call with no mechanism for review has exposed a structural gap the sport will need to close if it wants its competitive credibility to match its ambitions in the region.

Know something we missed? Have a correction or additional information?

Submit a Tip

Never miss a story.
Get Pickleball in Asia updates weekly.

The top stories delivered to your inbox.

Free forever · Unsubscribe anytime

Discussion

More Pickleball in Asia News