Maldonado v. Target listed as new slip-and-fall case in Los Angeles County
A slip-and-fall lawsuit by Marilyn Maldonado against Target Corporation was listed Feb. 4 in Los Angeles County; it raises questions about in-store safety and employee reporting practices.

A new premises-liability matter filed under the name Maldonado v. Target Corporation was listed Feb. 4, 2026 in Los Angeles County, with plaintiff Marilyn Maldonado pursuing personal-injury and slip-and-fall negligence claims against Target. The case has been designated new/unfiled, placing it at the earliest stage of litigation and drawing attention to store-level safety practices that affect frontline workers.
Marilyn Maldonado is represented by The Injury Law Firm, and the complaint alleges negligence related to a slip-and-fall incident at a Target location. Specifics of the incident and any claimed injuries have not been detailed in the filing notice, but the listing signals that formal legal action is underway. As a new/unfiled matter, the next steps typically include the filing of a complaint, service on Target, and the opening of discovery if the case advances.
For Target employees, cases like Maldonado v. Target tend to ripple through daily operations. Store managers may receive directives to review incident-reporting protocols, retrain staff on spill response and hazard signage, and tighten documentation of maintenance and cleaning logs. Loss prevention and store leadership often need to re-examine how quickly hazards are addressed and how employee reports are escalated, since documented timelines and corrective actions can be central in premises-liability disputes.
The legal exposure in slip-and-fall suits does not necessarily hinge on a single factor; it often turns on whether employees followed company procedures and whether those procedures were adequate. That makes record-keeping important for associates who respond to spills, broken fixtures, or other hazards. Associates who file internal incident reports, preserve photos, and notify supervisors can help protect both customers and the company from escalated liability.

At the corporate level, Target’s risk-management and legal teams will review the claim and determine whether to seek early resolution or litigate. Outcomes can include settlement, dismissal, or trial, and any high-profile or repeated incidents can influence companywide safety initiatives. For store employees, that can translate into updated training modules, audits of cleaning schedules, and renewed emphasis on visible hazard control like mats, cones, and wet-floor signs.
Workers should be alert to any new guidance from management and should follow established procedures for reporting and documenting hazards. For those involved in loss-prevention or store leadership, now is a moment to verify that incident logs, associate statements, and corrective-action records are current and easily accessible. The Maldonado case underscores how a single slip-and-fall claim can prompt operational and policy reviews that affect shifts, staffing, and daily responsibilities across stores. Expect additional court filings in the coming weeks that will clarify the allegations and next steps.
Know something we missed? Have a correction or additional information?
Submit a Tip

