Politics

Caputo files first claim under Trump administration’s anti-weaponization fund

Michael Caputo claimed $2.7 million from the new anti-weaponization fund, putting Trump allies first in line for taxpayer-backed compensation.

Lisa Park··2 min read
Published
Listen to this article0:00 min
Share this article:
Caputo files first claim under Trump administration’s anti-weaponization fund
Source: pexels.com

Michael Caputo became the first known claimant to seek money from the Justice Department’s new $1.776 billion anti-weaponization fund, asking for $2.7 million just a day after the program was announced. His filing immediately turned the fund into a test of how the government will measure political harm, verify claims, and decide whether proximity to Donald Trump becomes a pathway to public compensation.

In a letter tied to his claim, Caputo said, “I was the target of the illegal Crossfire Hurricane investigation,” invoking the FBI’s 2016 Russia probe as the basis for restitution and reimbursement. Caputo, a former Health and Human Services spokesperson and longtime Trump ally, spent part of the 1990s living in Russia while working for the U.S. government and later served as assistant secretary for public affairs during the COVID-19 pandemic. He remained in Trump’s orbit after leaving the campaign.

The Justice Department set up the fund on May 18 as part of the settlement in Trump v. Internal Revenue Service. Trump, Donald Trump Jr., Eric Trump and the Trump Organization received a formal apology but no money, while Trump agreed to drop his IRS lawsuit and related administrative claims tied to the Mar-a-Lago raid and Russia-collusion allegations. The department said the fund will be financed with $1.776 billion from the federal Judgment Fund and overseen by a five-member commission appointed by the attorney general.

AI-generated illustration
AI-generated illustration

The program is designed to hear claims from people who say they suffered “weaponization and lawfare,” and the department said there are no partisan requirements to apply. That leaves the commission with the central question Caputo now forces into the open: what level of proof is enough to show that a federal investigation crossed the line from enforcement into political retaliation, especially when a claimant has long been part of the president’s political world.

Caputo’s record complicates that answer. He was not initially a primary target of the FBI investigation, but Robert Mueller’s report later described covert coordination with Russia and said Caputo brokered a meeting between Trump confidant Roger Stone and a Russian operative. That history will sit beside any plea for compensation, making his claim an unusually fraught first case for a taxpayer-backed fund intended to redress abuse by the government.

Related photo
Source: media-cldnry.s-nbcnews.com

The department has pointed to the Obama-era Keepseagle settlement as a model for a redress fund, but this program is built to resolve claims involving a former president and his allies. It is scheduled to stop processing claims no later than December 1, 2028, and any money left over will revert to the federal government. For now, Caputo’s filing is the first real test of whether the new commission can police its own standards without turning a compensation program into another political battleground.

Know something we missed? Have a correction or additional information?

Submit a Tip

Never miss a story.

Get Prism News updates weekly. The top stories delivered to your inbox.

Free forever · Unsubscribe anytime

Discussion

More in Politics