Monday.com Employees Can Use Plain-Language Options Guide to Decode Equity Pay
Equity pays differently than salary, and monday.com’s own filings show why vesting, exercise timing and stock-linked costs can change what a grant is really worth.

Plain-language options are the right starting point
At a company with roughly 245,000 customers in more than 200 countries and territories, compensation can look simple on paper and still behave very differently in practice. That is why Investor.gov’s plain-language options glossary is useful for anyone at monday.com trying to decode a grant, whether it arrives in an offer letter, a promotion package or a retention conversation.
Investor.gov defines options as contracts that give the purchaser the right, but not the obligation, to buy or sell a security at a fixed price within a specific time period. That definition is broader than employee stock comp, but it gets to the heart of the issue workers run into again and again: price, timing and expiration matter just as much as the headline number. If you do not know those three pieces, you do not really know what the equity is worth.
Why equity is not just another salary line
The most common mistake employees make is treating all equity like cash with a delay. It is not. Equity has a structure, and that structure decides when value is created, when it becomes accessible and what can happen if the company’s stock, your job or the broader market changes before you can use it.
That is especially important at monday.com because the company is no longer a private startup story. It began trading on Nasdaq on June 10, 2021, after an IPO that closed at $155.00 per ordinary share, and underwriters exercised an option to buy 370,000 additional shares. In other words, the company’s stock has been in the public market long enough for equity awards to be tied to real market movement, not just internal promises.
The SEC’s Topic 718 guidance also makes clear that share-based compensation can take several forms, including share options, restricted share plans, performance-based awards, share appreciation rights and employee share purchase plans. That matters because a worker who thinks they have "equity" may actually have a grant with very different economics, tax treatment and risk depending on the instrument. Public companies recognize compensation cost at fair value, which is another reminder that this is not a symbolic perk. It is part of how the company accounts for labor.
What monday.com employees should ask before saying yes
The plain-language guide becomes practical when it changes the questions you ask. A compensation package with equity should never be accepted on faith or on jargon alone. The right questions turn a vague benefit into something you can compare against salary, bonus and your own career timeline.
A useful checklist looks like this:
- What instrument am I getting, options, RSUs, or something else?
- When does it vest, and does it cliff or vest monthly after a first year?
- What happens if I leave before vesting is complete?
- If it is options, what is the exercise window after I leave?
- If the company is public, private or acquired, what changes about how I can realize value?
Those questions are not academic. They decide whether a grant is a meaningful part of your compensation or just a number that sits in a portal. They also matter for managers and recruiters, who often want to talk about equity as upside while skipping the constraints that make that upside reachable.
Why the issue cuts deeper at a public SaaS company
At monday.com, equity conversations sit close to morale, retention and promotion decisions. That is true in any growth company, but it is especially true in a public SaaS business where stock performance can move quickly and employees can see the gap between a paper grant and actual value widening or narrowing in real time.
The company’s 2024 filing said it had approximately 245,000 customers across more than 200 industries and in over 200 countries and territories, with offices in Tel Aviv, New York, Denver, London, Warsaw, Sydney, Melbourne, São Paulo and Tokyo. That footprint tells you something important about the stakes: equity at monday.com is not an abstract startup lottery ticket. It is part of compensation at a global operating company with a large customer base and a growing international workforce.
The financial scale reinforces that point. monday.com said fiscal 2024 revenue reached $972.0 million, up 33% year over year, and fourth-quarter revenue hit $268.0 million, up 32% year over year. The company also said in February 2025 that it had surpassed $1 billion in annual recurring revenue. Those are the kinds of milestones that make employees pay closer attention to how stock-linked pay is structured, because growth can lift morale, but it can also magnify the difference between vesting on paper and cashing out in practice.
Why the company cares too
Equity literacy is not only an employee protection issue. monday.com’s own filings show that share-based compensation is material enough to affect financial reporting and guidance. The company said its share-based compensation expense is variable enough that it could not forecast GAAP operating income without unreasonable efforts. That is a blunt reminder that stock-based pay is not a side note in the business. It is part of the cost structure.
The 2024 Foundation Share Incentive Plan adds another layer. It authorizes options, restricted shares, RSUs, share appreciation rights and other share-based awards for service providers tied to monday.com Foundation Ltd. and its affiliates. For workers, the practical meaning is simple: even inside one company, not every equity grant works the same way, and the details determine whether the award is useful, delayed or limited by exit timing.
That is the real value of Investor.gov’s plain-language approach. It strips away the mystique and puts the focus where it belongs, on terms, timing and tradeoffs. At monday.com, where the company’s public-market profile, global scale and share-based compensation all intersect, understanding those terms is part of basic career literacy.
Know something we missed? Have a correction or additional information?
Submit a Tip

